izpis_h1_title_alt

ANALIZA SODB PRI RAZMEJITVI PRISTOJNOSTI MED EU IN DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI
ID GOD, NIKA (Author), ID Kuhelj, Alenka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,69 MB)
MD5: 0CA4FAC2C240E4FF2F2DB8D11C242738
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/332c30dd-797f-4118-90a8-7b17f7d6dce5

Abstract
Razmejitev pristojnosti med EU in državami članicami je določena v PUE in ponazarja razmerje med skupnostjo in njenimi deli. Zanjo velja načelo prenosa pristojnosti, ki določa, da ima EU pristojnosti, ki so jih države članice prenesle nanjo. Za nadzor izvajanja pristojnosti je s PEU veljalo načelo subsidiarnosti, pri katerem EU deluje na področjih, ki niso v njeni izključni pristojnosti samo, če države članice ne morejo doseči ciljev predlaganih ukrepov in se le-ti lažje dosežejo na ravni EU. V načelu sorazmernosti oblast ukrepa samo toliko in tako, da je ukrep nujen, torej je sorazmeren cilju. Vrste pristojnosti so določene v pogodbi, in sicer se delijo na izključne pristojnosti EU, deljene pristojnosti med EU in državami članicami ter na dodatne pristojnosti. Kjer ima EU izključno pristojnost sama, izdaja in sprejema akte, države članice posežejo le v primeru, če jih EU pooblasti za njihovo izvajanje. Pri deljeni pristojnosti tako EU kot države članice izdajajo in sprejemajo akte, torej tam, kjer EU ne izvaja, izvajajo države članice. Pri dodatnih pristojnosti EU sprejme ukrepe za podporo in uskladitev ukrepov držav članic. V magistrskem delu me je zanimalo, koliko sodb je bilo vloženih proti državam članicam zaradi neupoštevanja nadoblasti EU, kar se šteje za kršitev pogodb. Evropska komisija je predlagala Sodišču EU, naj ugotovi, ali posamezna država članica izpolnjuje naložene obveznosti EU. O tem, ali je tožba obsodilna oziroma oprostilna, je odločalo Sodišče EU. Osredotočila sem se na tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti držav članic v letih 2013–2016 glede na področja izključnih, deljenih in dodatnih pristojnosti.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:razmejitev pristojnosti, izključne pristojnosti EU, deljene pristojnosti med EU in državami članicami, dodatne pristojnosti EU, tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-97488 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.10.2017
Views:1924
Downloads:611
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:THE ANALYSIS OF JUDGEMENTS IN THE DELIMITATION OF COMPETENCES BETWEEN THE EU AND MEMBER STATES
Abstract:
The delimitation of competences between the EU and member states is laid down in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and it illustrates the relationship between the community and its parts. The principle of delegation is valid for the delimitation of competences which provides that the EU has competences reordered to it by member state. The principle of subsidiarity is in TEU. It surveillance implementations competences in which the EU operates in areas where they cannot fall under its exclusive competence only if the objectives of the proposed action cannot be achieved by the member state and can be better achieved at EU level. In the principle of proportionality, the authority takes action but only so much is necessary so it can proportionate to the goal. Types of competences are laid down in the Treaty which are divided into the exclusive competence of the EU, shared competences between the EU and member states and additional competences. Where the EU has exclusive competence itself issuing and adopting acts. Member states intervene only if the EU authorizes them to implement acts. In the case of shared competence both the EU and member states issue and accept some acts, in case where the EU does not implement it, they are implemented by the member states. For additional competences the EU takes measures to support and coordinate actions of member states. In the master's thesis I was interested in how many judgments were brought against member states because of disregard of the authority EU which is considered breach of contracts. The European commission has asked the EU court to determine whether each member state fulfils imposed EU obligations. The court of justice has ruled whether action was convict or released. I have focused on actions for failure to fulfil obligations of member states in the years 2013-2016 in terms of areas of exclusive, shared and additional competences.

Keywords:separation of competences, exclusive competence of the EU, shared competence between the EU and member states, complementary competence of the EU, judgements

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back