PRIMERJAVA POSEBNEGA NATEČAJNEGA POSTOPKA IMENOVANJA URADNIKOV NA POLOŽAJIH MED SLOVENIJO IN VELIKO BRITANIJO

Kijevčanin, Kim Patricia (author), Stare, Janez (mentor)

Leta 2003 je bil z Zakonom o javnih uslužbencih ustanovljen Uradniški svet, njegov namen pa je, da bi položajna uradniška mesta zasedli kandidati, ki so zato najbolj usposobljeni. Uradniški svet za vsak posebni natečajni postopek posebej imenuje posebno natečajno komisijo, ki skrbi, da razgovori s kandidati potekajo strokovno in objektivno. Glede na to, da sta si državi zelo različni, je povsem logično, da posebni natečajni postopki ne potekajo po istem principu. Pa vendar se poraja vprašanje, v kakšni meri bi lahko Slovenija posnemala Veliko Britanijo ter kako bi lahko slovenski posebni natečajni postopki potekali še hitrejše in učinkovitejše. Da bi bilo ugotovljeno, kakšne so pomanjkljivosti v samem poteku posebnega natečajnega postopka v Sloveniji in kaj bi bilo lahko spremenjeno ali dopolnjeno, je bila pomočjo anketnega vprašalnika opravljena raziskava med posamezniki, ki sodelujejo v posebnih natečajnih postopkih. Raziskava, ki je bila opravljena, daje vpogled v sam potek postopka in hkrati prikazuje veliko razliko med državama. Poleg tega, da je za Veliko Britanijo značilna stroga ločenost politike od uprave, je drugačna tudi končna odločitev, kjer komisija za izbiro izbere samo enega primernega kandidata, medtem ko jih posebna natečajna komisija več. Rezultati, ki so bili pridobljeni v sklopu spletne ankete so podali zanimive odgovore. Na podlagi ugotovitev, bi bila smiselna popolna ločenost politike in uprave. Medtem ko bi večina anketirancev v slovenskem okolju strogo ločila politiko od uprave in tako preprečila vdor političnih funkcionarjev v potek posebnih natečajnih postopkov, so še vedno večinsko odgovorili, da ni nič spornega, če člane Uradniškega sveta imenuje vlada. Kdo torej kroji usodo zaposlovanja uradnikov na položajih?

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: Uradniški svet, posebna natečajna komisija, uradniki na položajih, kompetenčni model, komisija za javne uslužbence, komisija za izbiro
• Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper
• Organization: FU - Faculty of Administration
• Year: 2017
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-96928
• Publication date in RUL: 17.10.2017

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: COMPARISON OF THE SPECIAL COMPETITION PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTING SENIOR CIVIL SERVANTS BETWEEN SLOVENIA AND GREAT BRITAIN

Abstract

In 2003, Slovenia’s Civil Servants Act established the Council of Officials, with the aim of selecting the most qualified candidates for the official public administration positions. For each procedure, the Council of Administration appoints a separate competition committee, which seeks to ensure that interviews with candidates are conducted in a professional and unbiased manner. The following study examines the course of the special competition procedure in Slovenia and compares it with the one implemented in Great Britain. Given that the countries are very different, it is quite logical that special competition procedures do not follow the same principle. However, the question arises as to how far Slovenia could imitate the United Kingdom and how the Slovenian special competition procedures could take place faster and more efficiently. In order to determine the shortcomings in the very course of the special competition procedure in Slovenia and what could have been amended or supplemented, the survey questionnaire conducted a survey among individuals participating in special competition procedures. The research that has been carried out gives an insight into the course of the process itself and at the same time shows a great difference between the states. In addition to the fact that Britain is characterized by a strict policy separation from the administration, a final decision is also different, where the selection board selects only one suitable candidate, while the special selection board is more than one. The results of the online survey revealed interesting findings. While most respondents in the Slovenian environment would draw a clear line between the politics and the administration and thus prevent the interference of political officials in the course of special competition procedures, the majority still answered that there was nothing contentious in the fact that the members of the Council of Officials were appointed by the government. Who therefore determines the fate of officials recruited for public administration positions?

• Keywords: Council of Officials, special competition boards, senior civil servants, Competeny framework, Civil service commission, selection panel