izpis_h1_title_alt

Načelo sorazmernosti v praksi Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije
ID Čuk, Jasmina (Author), ID Pavčnik, Marijan (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (711,10 KB)
MD5: 55046A29C6CDC46EF2E16B822FE9A925
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/00340c1f-89c1-4e16-9992-bda2066214f1

Abstract
Načelo sorazmernosti je eno temeljnih načel slovenskega pravnega reda. Uvedlo ga je Ustavno sodišče po zgledu tujih ureditev (še posebno nemške), na kar se je najprej tudi naslonilo pri utemeljevanju njegovega izvora. Sčasoma je načelo izpeljalo iz načela pravne države (2. člen Ustave RS). Presoja ustavnosti je v Sloveniji sestavljena iz dveh delov: test legitimnosti in test sorazmernosti. Prvi pogoj za dopustnost posega v ustavne pravice je, da ta zasleduje ustavno upravičen cilj. Ukrep mora biti primeren, nujen in sorazmeren v ožjem smislu. Čeprav načelo teži k primernemu ravnovesju med dvema pravicama ali interesoma, nekateri tuji avtorji nasprotujejo njegovi uporabi. Grajajo predvsem relativizacijo človekovih pravic. Kljub temu lahko ugotovimo, da je načelo sorazmernosti najustreznejša metoda za tehtanje med pravnimi dobrinami.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:načelo sorazmernosti, človekove pravice, strogi test sorazmernosti, proporcionalnost, ustavno sodišče, ustavno pravo
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-96534 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:15847249 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.10.2017
Views:9763
Downloads:2844
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:Unknown
Title:Principle of proportionality in the case law of Slovenian Constitutional Court
Abstract:
Proportionality is one of the general principles of Slovenian law. It was introduced by the Constitutional Court following the example of foreign legal orders (especially Germany). Over time, the principle was derived from the rule of law (Article 2 of the Constitution). The Court employs a four-tier test. First of all, in order for the challenged provision to pass the test, the interference must pursue a constitutionally admissible aim. Following that, the test comprises a review of three aspects of the interference: appropriateness, necessity and proportionality in the narrower sense. Only if the interference passes all three aspects of the test is it constitutionally admissible. Although the principle seeks to strike a proper balance between different rights or interests, some foreign authors object to its use. The strength and protection of human rights is particularly at stake. Nevertheless, we can conclude that the principle of proportionality is the most appropriate method of balancing.

Keywords:principle of proportionality, human rights, exercise and limitation of rights, judicial review, constitutional court, constitutional law, balancing

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back