izpis_h1_title_alt

Presoja dopustnosti razpisa zakonodajnega referenduma v Državnem zboru
ID Nartnik, Ula (Author), ID Kaučič, Igor (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,15 MB)
MD5: 0344DC4F66632B0B165E3EFEE71DC894
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/7928dd9b-6f83-4ca3-a37e-faac96757f97

Abstract
Sprememba ustavne ureditve zakonodajnega referenduma leta 2013 je v ta institut posegla v treh delih – zmanjšala je število predlagateljev referenduma, določila je primere nedopustnosti razpisa zakonodajnega referenduma ter dvignila prag legitimnosti na referendumu sprejete odločitve. Za temo magistrske naloge je najpomembnejše, da je s to spremembo Državni zbor prejel več pristojnosti, saj je po novi ureditvi on ključen organ, ki skladno z ustavno ureditvijo odloči, ali je zakonodajni referendum o določenem zakonu dopustno razpisati ali ne. Predhodno je bila ta odločitev v rokah Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije. Ustavna sprememba predstavlja materialno pravno podlago za odločanje Državnega zbora, zato je na začetku magistrske naloge kratko povzeta ureditev zakonodajnega referenduma, z osredotočenostjo na ustavno ureditev. V nadaljevanju je nato obravnavan zakonodajni referendum, predvsem s procesnega vidika, saj so predstavljene temeljne določbe referendumskega postopka. Glavni del magistrskega dela je posvečen dogajanju v Državnem zboru. Predstavljen je časovni vidik odločanja o dopustnosti razpisa zakonodajnega referenduma, odločitev zavrnitve razpisa zakonodajnega referenduma, sodno varstvo zoper odločitev subjektov v referendumskem postopku, v povezavi z vsem navedenim pa pristojnosti Državnega zbora in predsednika Državnega zbora. Veliko dilem po uveljavitvi ustavne spremembe je razrešilo tudi že Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije, zato so podrobneje predstavljene tudi njegove odločitve.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:zakonodajni referendum, Državni zbor, predsednik Državnega zbora, referendumski postopek, sprememba Ustave Republike Slovenije
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2017
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-95584 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:15803985 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.09.2017
Views:2065
Downloads:724
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Assessment of the permissibility of a call for the legislative referendum in the National Assembly
Abstract:
The change in the constitutional structure of the legislative referendum in 2013 affected legislative referendum in three ways – it reduced the number of proposers of the referendum, determined cases of inadmissibility of the call for a referendum, and prescribed the participation of a certain number of voters in a referendum as a condition for the adoption of a valid decision. The most important thing about the topic of this master's thesis is that with this change the National Assembly has received more power, since according to the new regulation it is a key body that, in accordance with the constitutional order, decides whether a legislative referendum on a particular law is to be permitted or not. Previously, this decision was in the hands of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia. The constitutional amendment presents a substantive legal basis for the decision of the National Assembly. Therefore, at the beginning of the master's thesis, the regulation of the legislative referendum is briefly summarized, with a focus on the constitutional system. In the following, the legislative referendum is discussed mainly from a procedural point of view, as the basic provisions of the referendum process are presented. The main part of the master's thesis is dedicated to the events in the National Assembly. The time aspect of deciding on the admissibility of the call for a legislative referendum, the decision to reject the call for a legislative referendum, the judicial protection against the decision of the entities in the referendum procedure, and the competences of the National Assembly and the President of the National Assembly related to all that. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia has already resolved many dilemmas after the constitutional amendment was introduced, which is why the decisions of the latter are presented in more detail.

Keywords:legislative referendum, National Assembly, President of the National Assembly, referendum procedure, amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back