Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
PRAVNI UČINKI USTAVNOSODNE PRESOJE
ID
ŠTANTA, NIKA
(
Author
),
ID
Čebulj, Janez
(
Mentor
)
More about this mentor...
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,15 MB)
MD5: 304F6711C4260D75847A135011EBFB83
PID:
20.500.12556/rul/09e51287-e04a-45b8-8e23-9bb994683d6d
Image galllery
Abstract
Za varstvo ustavnosti in zakonitosti ter človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin skrbi Ustavno sodišče, ki je najvišji sodni organ. Ustavno sodišče ima v Sloveniji široke pristojnosti, ena izmed temeljnih je prav presoja ustavnosti in zakonitosti zakonov, podzakonskih predpisov in splošnih aktov izdanih za izvrševanje javnih pooblastil. Postopek ustavnosodne presoje predpisov se vedno konča z eno izmed odločitev Ustavnega sodišča oziroma z uporabo ene izmed t. i. tehnik odločanja, ki se razlikujejo glede učinkovanja. Predvsem od pravnih učinkov odločitev Ustavnega sodišča je odvisna učinkovitost ustavnosodne presoje predpisov. Za funkcionalen pravni sistem in pravno varnost je zato bistveno, da so pravni učinki takšnih odločb predvidljivi in v naprej določeni. V magistrskem delu sem se posvetila predvsem pravnim učinkom odločitev Ustavnega sodišča in tehnikam odločanja pri posamezni vrsti pravnega akta tako pri splošnih kot pri posamičnih pravnih aktih. Pravne učinke ustavnosodnih odločitev sem primerjala z ureditvijo pravnih učinkov v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji, ki ima podoben ustavnosodni sistem kot Slovenija. S primerjavo sem želela prikazati podobnosti in razlike med našo in nemško ureditvijo tehnik odločanja in z njimi povezanih pravnih učinkov. Na podlagi ugotovljenih prednosti in slabosti sem skušala dognati nekatere rešitve oziroma primere praks, ki bi bile primerne in uporabne tudi za našo ureditev. Magistrsko delo poskuša sproti opozarjati na pomanjkljivosti normativne ureditve pravnih učinkov in na dileme, ki se lahko pojavijo v praksi, ter prikazuje rešitve za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti in dilem.
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
Ustavno sodišče
,
Zakon o ustavnem sodišču
,
ustavnosodna presoja pravnih aktov
,
ustavna pritožba
,
tehnike odločanja
,
pravni učinki
Work type:
Master's thesis/paper
Organization:
FU - Faculty of Administration
Year:
2017
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-89274
Publication date in RUL:
01.03.2017
Views:
2931
Downloads:
637
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
ŠTANTA, NIKA, 2017,
PRAVNI UČINKI USTAVNOSODNE PRESOJE
[online]. Master’s thesis. [Accessed 3 June 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=89274
Copy citation
Share:
Secondary language
Language:
English
Title:
THE LEGAL EFFECTS IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW
Abstract:
The Constitutional Court is the highest body of judicial power for the protection of constitutionality, legality, human rights and fundamental freedoms. In Slovenia, it has wide-ranging powers. One of its principal powers concerns reviewing the constitutionality and legality of laws as well as implementing regulations and general acts, issued for the exercise of public powers. The process of the constitutional review shall always be concluded either by one of the decisions of the Constitutional Court, or by using one of the so-called decision-making techniques, which differ with regard to their effects. The effectiveness of the Constitutional review of regulations depends primarily on legal effects of decisions of the Constitutional Court. Predictable and predetermined legal effects of such decisions are thus crucial for a functional legal system and legal certainty. The present Master's Thesis focuses mainly on legal effects of Constitutional Court decisions and decision-making techniques in each type of legal act, both general and individual. The legal effects of constitutional decisions were compared to the regulation of legal effects in the Federal Republic of Germany that has a constitutional system similar to the one in Slovenia. The comparison was intended to show similarities and differences between the Slovene and German regulation of the decision-making techniques and related legal effects. The advantages and disadvantages identified helped demonstrate a number of solutions or examples of practices that would also be suitable and useful for the Slovene regulation. The Master's Thesis raises awareness on the shortcomings of the regulatory framework of legal effects and on dilemmas that may arise in practice, as well as demonstrates solutions for the elimination of the above mentioned shortcomings and dilemmas.
Keywords:
Constitutional Court
,
Constitutional Court Act
,
constitutional review of legal acts
,
constitutional complaint
,
decision-making techniques
,
legal effects
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Računalnik pri jezikovni obdelavi - terminološke baze in slovarji
Statistična analiza slovenskih jezikovnih korpusov
Jezikovna zvrstnost v sodobnih medijih
Slovenska jezikovna skupnost 1918
Slovenščina, kontinuum
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Kvantitativni oris romanov Ivana Preglja
Računalniško podprta proizvodnja
Baze podatkov v računalniško integrirani proizvodnji CIM
Računalniško podprta izdelava zasuna
Model proizvodno-informacijskega sistema
Back