izpis_h1_title_alt

Prepoznavanje ustvarjalnega potenciala pri učencih v prvem triletju osnovne šole
ID Zabukovec, Maruša (Author), ID Juriševič, Mojca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/4357/ This link opens in a new window

Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo se ukvarjali s prepoznavanjem ustvarjalnega potenciala pri učencih v prvem triletju osnovne šole. V teoretičnem delu smo predstavili nekatere definicije ustvarjalnosti in opredelili ustvarjalnost s štirih vidikov: ustvarjalnega okolja, ustvarjalne osebnosti, ustvarjalnega procesa in ustvarjalnega produkta. V nadaljevanju smo se natančneje posvetili ocenjevanju ustvarjalnosti na osnovi ustvarjalnega produkta, ustvarjalnega procesa in ustvarjalne osebnosti. Predstavili smo test EPoC – Test za oceno ustvarjalnega potenciala, razvoj ustvarjalnosti v otroštvu, značilnosti otrokove ustvarjalnosti, načine spodbujanja ustvarjalnosti v razredu in pozitivne vplive spodbujanja ustvarjalnosti na celoten otrokov razvoj. V empiričnem delu so predstavljeni rezultati raziskave med učenci prvih treh razredov osnovne šole, v katerem smo na osnovi uporabe testa EPoC-a prepoznali ustvarjalni potencial učencev na dveh področjih mišljenja – divergentno-eksplorativnem in konvergentno-integrativnem in na dveh področjih izražanja – govorno-literarnem in slikovno-likovnem področju. V vzorec je bilo naključno izbranih 54 učencev prvega triletja osnovne šole, ki so test EPoC reševali po standardnem postopku, ki ga je vodila usposobljena testatorka. Zanimalo nas je, ali se učenci razlikujejo po višini ustvarjalnega potenciala glede na spol in razred, iz katerega prihajajo, in kateremu individualnemu tipu ustvarjalnega potenciala ustrezajo, ter ali obstaja povezanost med spolom in razredom, ter številom podanih ustvarjalnih odgovorov oz. izraženostjo ustvarjalnega odgovora. Rezultati so pokazali, da imajo dečki in deklice podoben ustvarjalni potencial - glede na število ustvarjalnih odgovorov oz. izraženost ustvarjalnega odgovora, rezultati niso pokazali statistično pomembnih razlik. Ugotovili smo tudi, da se učenci razlikujejo po višini ustvarjalnega potenciala glede na razred, iz katerega prihajajo. Pri količniku divergentno-grafičnega področja obstaja statistično pomembna razlika med učenci prvega in drugega razreda, pri količniku divergentno-verbalnega področja obstaja statistično pomembna razlika med učenci prvega in drugega razreda ter učenci prvega in tretjega razreda. Pri količniku integrativno-verbalnega področja ustvarjalnega potenciala obstaja statistično pomembna razlika med učenci prvega in tretjega razreda. Z vidika prepoznavanja individualnih tipov ustvarjalnega potenciala rezultati kažejo, da največ učencev ustreza divergentnemu tipu ustvarjalnega potenciala, temu sledijo visok tip ustvarjalnega potenciala, slikovni tip ustvarjalnega potenciala, besedni tip ustvarjalnega potenciala ter nizek ustvarjalni tip ustvarjalnega potenciala. Integrativni tip ustvarjalnega potenciala ni bil prepoznan pri nobenem učencu iz vzorca raziskave. Ugotovili smo, da obstaja povezanost med številom ustvarjalnih odgovorov in razredom, ki ga učenci obiskujejo, pri slikovno-likovnem podtestu divergentno-eksplorativnega mišljenja na podlagi abstraktne spodbude med prvim in drugim razredom, ter da obstaja povezanost med izraženostjo ustvarjalnega odgovora pri besedno-literarnem podtestu konvergentno-integrativnega mišljenja – naslov zgodbe in razredom, v primeru prvega in tretjega razreda. Raziskovalni izsledki iz te raziskave na splošno potrjujejo, da se v slovenski osnovni šoli ustvarjalnost premalo spodbuja ter narekujejo natančnejše pedagoške pristope za spodbujanje ustvarjalnosti in spodbujajo k nadaljnjemu raziskovanju obravnavanega področja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:ustvarjalnost
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Year:2016
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-88910 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:11439689 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.08.2017
Views:871
Downloads:98
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The identification of creative potential among first cycle primary school learners
Abstract:
The thesis addresses the identification of creative potential of pupils in the first educational cycle of primary school. We introduced some definitions of creativity in the theoretical part of the thesis and determined creativity from four points of view: creative background, creative personality, creative process and creative product. We accurately devoted our work to the assessment of creativity based on the creative product, creative process and creative personality. We introduced the EPoC (Evaluation of Potential Creativity ) test – the test is used to assess creative potential, development of creativity in childhood, features of child's creativity, different ways of stimulating the creativity in the classroom and positive influence of stimulation of creativity on child's development. The results of a research of pupils of the first three classes of primary school are in the empirical part of the thesis. Using the EPoC test we recognised the creative potential of pupils on two fields of thinking – divergent-exploratory and convergent-integrative and on two fields of conveyance – verbal-literaly and artistic-graphic field. 54 pupils of the first educational cycle of primary school were randomly chosen in a sample. They took the EPoC test using standard procedures and which was leaded by qualified expert. We wanted to know, if pupils differentiated by height of creative potential, considering gender and class they are attending, and which individual type of creative potential do they meet and whether there is a connection between gender and class and the number of handed creative answers or conveyance of creative answers. Results indicated that boys and girls had similar creative potential - considering number of creative answers or conveyance of creative answers. These results didn't show statistically important differences. We also found out that pupils differentiated by height of creative potential considering the class they are attending. There is a statistically important difference of quotient of divergent-graphic field between the pupils of the first and second class. There is also a statistically important difference of quotient of divergent-verbal field between the pupils of the first and second class and pupils of the first and third class. There is a statistically important difference of quotient of integrative-verbal field of creative potential between pupils of the first and third class. The results of recognising the individual types of creative potential indicate that most pupils meet divergent profile of creative potential, which is followed by high profile, the graphic profile, the verbal profile and low potential profile of creative potential. Integrative profile of creative potential was not recognised at all. We found out that there is a connection between the number of creative answers and class, that pupils are attending at artistic –graphic subtest of divergent-exploratory thinking based on abstract stimulation between the first and second class. There is also a connection between conveyance of creative conversation at verbal-literaly subtest of convergent-integrative thinking – and the title of a story and class in the first and third class.

Keywords:creativity

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back