izpis_h1_title_alt

Varstvo novinarskih zaupnih virov : pravna ureditev in stališča slovenskih novinarjev
ID Čeferin, Rok (Author), ID Poler Kovačič, Melita (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/TiP2015_4_CeferinPoler-Kovacic.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Glavni cilj tega članka je raziskati, kako je varstvo novinarskih zaupnih virov opredeljeno v normativnih aktih Sveta Evrope in Evropske unije, kakšna je sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in kakšna je normativna ureditev zaščite virov v Sloveniji. Avtorja ugotavljata, da je v evropskem pravnem prostoru od novinarjev dopustno zahtevati razkritje skrivnega vira le izjemoma, ko za to obstaja intenziven javni interes, in predlagata spremembe slovenske zakonodaje. Analizo relevantnih pravnih dokumentov in sodne prakse dopolnjujeta z metodo polstrukturiranih intervjujev s 15 novinarji. Stališča intervjuvancev o dopustnosti razkritja zaupnega vira so različna, prevladujoče pa je, da je obljubo zaupnosti - razen v izjemnih okoliščinah - treba spoštovati.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2015
Number of pages:Str. 631-650, 812
Numbering:Letn. 52, št. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-85414 This link opens in a new window
UDC:070:34(497.4)
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:33471837 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.09.2016
Views:1532
Downloads:184
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
The main goal of this article is to research how the protection of journalists' confidential sources is defined in the normative documents of the Council of Europe and the European Union, what is the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, and what is the normative regulation of source protection in Slovenia. The authors state that in the European legal arena it is allowed to demand that a journalist reveal a secret source only exceptionally, when there is intense public interest, and they suggest changes in the Slovenian legislation. Analysis of the relevant legal documents and case law is combined with the method of semi-structured interviews with 15 journalists. The interviewees have different views on whether revealing a confidential source is admissible; the prevalent one is that the promise of confidentiality should be respected unless the circumstances are exceptional.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back