izpis_h1_title_alt

Poročanje o sovražnem govoru poslancev v luči novinarske (ne)objektivnosti
ID Poler Kovačič, Melita (Author), ID Vobič, Igor (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/TiP2012_1_PolerKovacic_Vobic.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Avtorja analizirata poročanje slovenskih novinarjev o sovražnem govoru in njihove etične probleme. (Med)besedilna analiza poročanja o sovražnem govoru med prvo obravnavo Predloga Družinskega zakonika je pokazala, da novinarji o sovražnem govoru poslancev niso poročali ali pa so v poročila vključili le nekatere manj skrajne izjave. Izogibali so se vrednotenju, sovražni govor so obsodili predvsem z besedami drugih virov. Intervjuji z avtorji analiziranih poročil so pokazali, da se bojijo učinkov razširjanja sovražnega govora s svojimi prispevki, imajo težave pri njegovem prepoznavanju in odločanju, kateri izrazi so sploh sprejemljivi za objavo, poleg tega v poročilih ne želijo komentirati.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:sovražni govor, poslanci, novinarji, javno obveščanje, novinarska etika, objektivnost
Work type:Not categorized (r6)
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2012
Number of pages:Str. 131-148, 232-233
Numbering:Letn. 49, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-85250 This link opens in a new window
UDC:070
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:416767 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.09.2016
Views:1238
Downloads:392
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa. revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
The authors analyse Slovenian journalistsʼ reporting on hate speech and their ethical problems. (Inter)textual analysis of reporting on hate speech expressed during the first reading of the proposed Family Law showed that journalists either did not report the parliamentary membersʼ hate speech or only included a few less extreme statements. They avoided evaluation and mostly condemned hate speech through the words of their sources. Interviews with the authors of the analysed reports revealed they are afraid of the effects the spreading of hate speech in news items might have, they have problems recognising it and deciding which words are appropriate for publication, and they do not want to comment in news reports


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back