izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava iskanja virov v DiKUL in Google Scholar : magistrsko delo
ID Novaković, Ana (Author), ID Južnič, Primož (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,82 MB)
MD5: 83A7F2F518E4329B53422DBEB97EA59B
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/ce63b307-d5e2-4e85-becc-0789b4881696

Abstract
Primerjali smo enostavno iskanje v DiKUL-u, iskalniku za potrebe raziskovanja, ki ga je za svoje namene razvila Univerza v Ljubljani in išče po njenih virih, z enostavnim iskanjem v Google Scholarju, iskalniku za potrebe raziskovanja, ki ga je razvil eden izmed najboljših snovalcev na svetovnem spletu. Z obema iskalnikoma smo izvedli enostavne tematske poizvedbe na različnih znanstvenih področjih in analizirali, kateri tipi dokumentov se pojavljajo v rezultatih iskanja, starost in dostopnost zadetkov, njihovo relevantnost in najpomembnejše bibliometrijske podatke med prvimi štiridesetimi zadetki. Med iskalnikoma prihaja do razlik med zadetki v seznamu rezultatov iskanja zaradi njunih različnih algoritmov za razvrščanje zadetkov po relevantnosti. Prihaja tudi do razlik med posameznimi znanstvenimi področji: z uporabo naših poizvedb je bil Google Scholar primerjalno slabši na področju družboslovja in naravoslovja, boljši pa na področju medicine in tehnike. Vendar se primerjalno slabši dosežki z vidika drugih kriterijev nujno ne odražajo tudi v relevantnosti. V DiKUL-u je več različnih tipov dokumentov in več dokumentov, ki so uporabnikom Univerze v Ljubljani dostopni v elektronski obliki. Oba iskalnika podata dobre rezultate, med katerimi je malo prekrivanja. DiKUL je primernejši za manj izkušene uporabnike, Google Scholar pa za bolj izkušene, ki bodo vedeli, kje in kako preveriti dodatno dostopnost gradiva, in znali kritično pristopiti k prestarim zadetkom in neprimernim vrstam gradiva.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:spletni iskalniki, znanstveno raziskovanje, Google Scholar, DiKUL, uporabniki, navade, integrirani knjižnični portali, centralni bibliografski indeksi, bolonjske magistrske naloge
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[A. Novaković]
Year:2016
Number of pages:99 f.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-85088 This link opens in a new window
UDC:004.659:[001.891:378](043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:61630050 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:12.09.2016
Views:3311
Downloads:525
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
We compared the simple searches in DiKUL, an academic search engine developed by University in Ljubljana for its own use that searches its sources and Google search, an academic search engine developed by one of the biggest players on the World Wide Web. We conducted simple thematic inquiries with both search engines on various scientific fields and analysed the types of documents in the search results, their age, availability of full text, their relevance and the most important bibliometric data within the first forty search results. The differences in the search results between the two search engines are due to their different algorithms for sorting results by relevance. There are also differences between different scientific fields - with our inquiries Google Scholar was comparatively worse in the fields of social and natural sciences, but better in the fields of medicine and engineering. However, comparatively poorer achievements with other criteria are not necessarily reflected in relevance. There are more different types of documents and more full text documents available in DiKUL's search results. Both search engines give good results, among which there is little overlap. DiKUL is more suitable for less experienced users, while Google Scholar is more suitable for more experienced users, who will know where and how to check the additional availability of the search results and will be able to critically approach the search results which are too old or of inappropriate type.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back