izpis_h1_title_alt

Deregulacija normativne ureditve urejanja prostora v Sloveniji : magistrsko delo
ID Konda, Katarina (Author), ID Vlahek, Ana (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Zavodnik Lamovšek, Alma (Thesis defence commission member), ID Pličanič, Senko (Thesis defence commission member), ID Damjan, Matija (Thesis defence commission member)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/5612/ This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,74 MB)
MD5: 0565B74E849CD8EFEAACC325F7FBB877
.zipZIP - Appendix, Download (110,89 KB)
MD5: 2917336CB17476D5477A6365483A08CA

Abstract
V magistrski nalogi obravnavamo občinske prostorske akte s poudarkom na prostorskih izvedbenih pogojih za posege v prostoru. Tema naloge izhaja iz pogostih kritik udeležencev v postopku pridobivanja gradbenega dovoljenja (zlasti projektantov), da so prostorski akti preveč normirani, preobsežni in neživljenjski. Posledično prihaja do zapletov, tako vsebinskih kot časovnih, pri izdelavi projektov za gradbeno dovoljenje, kar vpliva na negotovost investicij v prostoru. Ker se kot predlog za izboljšavo stanja pogosto predlaga deregulacija, smo v nalogi preverili stanje določil v občinskih prostorskih načrtih in ali deregulacija predstavlja pravo rešitev opredeljenega problema. Z analizo zakonodaje od leta 1875 do danes, primeri iz tuje zakonodaje in teorije, analizo veljavnih občinskih prostorskih načrtov mestnih občin v Sloveniji in anketo med izdelovalci prostorskih aktov, je bilo preverjeno ali so prostorski izvedbeni pogoji res nejasni oz. preveč določeni. Izkazalo se je, da ta trditev drži in da je vzrok za večji delež težav slabo nomotehnično stanje občinskih prostorskih načrtov, katerih določila pretežno priporočajo, namesto da bi eksaktno predpisala poseg, pogosto so tudi preveč splošna (npr. določajo upoštevanje lokalne tradicije oblikovanja) obenem pa ne določijo vsaj osnovnih značilnosti takega oblikovanja. Posledično so možne različne interpretacije določila, kar uporabniku daje občutek, da so določila nejasna.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:geodezija, magistrska dela, interdisciplinarni študij, občinski prostorski načrti, prostorski izvedbeni pogoji, urbanistična merila, jasnost, deregulacija
Work type:Master's thesis (m2)
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Year:2016
Publisher:[K. Konda]
Number of pages:XXII, 147 str., 1 pril.
Place:Ljubljana
UDC:711(497.4)(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:7555937 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:29.07.2016
Views:1731
Downloads:744
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Deregulation of the normative spatial planing regulation in Slovenia
Abstract:
Master thesis deals with municipal planning documents with the emphasis on spatial implementation conditions. Developers and architects (especially designers) are often criticizing municipal regulations in the process of obtaining construction permits, saying they are too normalized, excessive and impractical. Consequently complications arise, both substantive and temporal, in acquiring building permits, which affects the uncertainty of investments in the area. Deregulation is often mentioned as a solution and it is due to this fact that we have analyzed the municipal spatial plans provisions and whether deregulation represents a real solution to the identified problem. By analyzing legislation from the year 1875 until today, examples of foreign law and theory, analysis of existing municipal spatial plans of municipalities in Slovenia and a survey among urban planners, who prepare planning documents, it was examined if the spatial implementation conditions are truly ambiguous and overdetermined. The results show that this statement is true and that many difficulties arise from inadequate legal language as well as from provisions which only suggest instead of regulate or are mostly too general (Eg. they provide consideration of traditional or modern quality facilities and arrangements in the area). At the same time they do not provide criteria to define what is traditional or of good quality. Consequently that causes possible different provision interpretations, which causes the user to think that the provisions are unclear.

Keywords:geodesy, municipal spatial plans, spatial implementation conditions, urban regulation, clarity, deregulation

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back