Narava, modernost, urbanost

Kos, Drago (author)

V prvem delu besedilo obravnava omejitve znanstvenih interpretacij narave. Standardnim epistemološkim težavam se pridružuje padanje zaupanja v znanost (tehnologijo), kar je vsaj deloma paradoksalna posledica individualne in institucionalne refleksivnosti (post)moderne družbe. Deloma izpraznjene interpretacijske oz. legitimizacijske zmožnosti nadomeščajo nove, dejansko reciklirane novodobne (new age) ideje. V drugem delu besedilo obravnava staro, toda še vedno odprto vprašanje 'narave' v urbanem prostoru. Obravnavane so nekatere zelo pogoste in očitne težave, s katerimi se soočamo pri poizkusih pomiritve oz. ureditve konflikta med umetnim, grajenim okoljem in romantično nostalgičnimi predstavami o življenju v 'naravnem' okolju. Na koncu poskuša besedilo odgovoriti na dilemo, ali je razprava o razmerju med naravo in mestom sploh mogoča, ne da bi bila obenem tudi protiurbana.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: urbani prostor
• Work type: Not categorized
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
• Year: 2011
• Number of pages: Str. 1156-1165, 1385
• Numbering: Letn. 48, jubilejna št.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-76581
• UDC: 711.4:502.2
• ISSN on article: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 30732125
• Publication date in RUL: 21.12.2015

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
• Shortened title: Teor. praksa
• Publisher: Fakulteta za družbene vede
• ISSN: 0040-3598
• COBISS.SI-ID: 763652

Secondary language

• Language: English

Abstract

The first part of the text deals with the limits of the scientific interpretation of nature. Standard epistemological problems combine with descending trust in science (technology). This is to a certain extent a paradoxical consequence of individual and institutional reflexivity in (post)modern society. The partly exhausted interpretation and legitimisation capacities are in the process of being replaced by new, in fact recycled 'new age' ideas. In the second part the text deals with the old but still unresolved question of 'nature' and the urban space. The text deals with some frequently mentioned and transparent problems in settling the conflict between the artificial, built environment and romantic nostalgic images of living in the 'natural' environment. At the end the text attempts to answer the dilemma of whether an urban-nature discussion is at all possible without producing an anti-urban result at the same time.