Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Politics of memory: on treatments of hate
ID
Cassin, Barbara
(
Author
)
URL - Presentation file, Visit
http://www.dlib.si/details/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-QDVDFBT5
Image galllery
Abstract
The management of memory in the public sphere has followed historically, in democracies, three radically heterogeneous models which, in turn, have affected the way in which citizens are allowed or refused access to critical moments of "parole publique." The first model concerns the first known procedure amnesty, a decree taken in Athens in 403BC, following the tyranny ofthe Thirty and a civil war. A decree of amnesia-amnesty, the Athenian imperative of "I would not remember" goes against everything which we today regard as the duty of memory within the sphere of public deliberation. The second model is offered, in today South Africa and following the collapse of apartheid, by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Here amnesty opposes amnesia as a duty is placed on perpetrators to engage, by way of public rituals of narration, a non-criminal judicial process of "full disclosure". The third model is a procedure in use in most contemporary democracies in the management of sensitive archives (the case studied here is that of French lawsregulating access files regarding World War Two and the Purge period in particular). These three models help shed light on certain relations between politics, discursive practice and deliberation, and enable us gain insights into the ways in which truth and deliberative politics are linked. The Athenian amnesia on civil war, and its duty of silence, and the South African full disclosure on a quasi civil war, with its duty of narration, fall on the same side of a divide, that of a memory politically alive, while the French memory-archive regarding collaboration, another form of civil war, relies entirely on a written treatment of documents that aim to de-politicize memory.All three models carry different implications for what we consider "parole publique" in a democracy and how private citizens, not experts, can orcannot engage the public past, in order to make informed choices regarding the common good.
Language:
English
Work type:
Not categorized
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:
2001
Number of pages:
Str. 9-22
Numbering:
Vol. 8, no. 3
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-75927
UDC:
659.3/.4
ISSN on article:
1318-3222
COBISS.SI-ID:
20916317
Publication date in RUL:
21.12.2015
Views:
1098
Downloads:
204
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Javnost
Shortened title:
Javnost
Publisher:
Taylor&Francis
ISSN:
1318-3222
COBISS.SI-ID:
40119808
Secondary language
Language:
Unknown
Title:
Politika spominjanja: ravnanje s sovraštvom
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back