Censorship. A philological (and rhetorical) viewpoint

Salazar, Philippe Joseph (author)

Beseda cenzura je filološko sodi v slovar ključnih pojmov v spektru oblastne paradigme. Članek temelji na analizah Émila Benvenista v Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes in razkriva cenzurne denotacije oblasti, vojne, nagrade, usmerjanja, pa tudi vtisnjeno cenzurno dimenzijo v retoričnem predsedništvu. Zaključuje z obravnavo cenzurnega premika v demokraciji od demos k laos.

• Language: English
• Work type: Not categorized
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
• Year: 2004
• Number of pages: Str. 5-18
• Numbering: Vol. 11, no. 2
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-75923
• UDC: 659.3/.4
• ISSN on article: 1318-3222
• COBISS.SI-ID: 23326301
• Publication date in RUL: 21.12.2015

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Javnost = The public
• Shortened title: Javnost
• Publisher: Taylor & Francis, European Institute for Communication and Culture
• ISSN: 1318-3222
• COBISS.SI-ID: 40119808

Secondary language

• Language: Unknown
• Title: Cenzura: filološki (in retorični) pogled

Abstract

The word "censorship" is philologically rooted in a glossary of key notions that span across the spectrum of the paradigm of authority. Based on analyses by Émile Benveniste, from his Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, this essay aims at bringing out the censorial denotations of "authority," "war," "award," "direction," as well as the embedded censorial dimension of, for instance, the rhetorical presidency. It closes on a reflexion concerning the censorial drift, within democracy, from demos to laos.