izpis_h1_title_alt

Predikatorji uspešnosti terapije jecljanja za predšolske otroke : diplomsko delo
ID Kotolenko, Nina (Author), ID Sardelić, Senka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Košir, Stanislav (Comentor)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/id/eprint/191 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Cilj raziskovalnega dela je bil preveriti uspešnost direktne terapije Centra za sluh in govor Maribor za predšolske otroke, ki jecljajo, glede na prediktroje tipi nefluentnosti, spol in temperament. Vzorec je zajemal 34 predšolskih otrok, pri katerih se je jecljanje pojavilo med 2. in 4. letom in je pred začetkom terapije trajalo že vsaj 6 mesecev. S tem smo se izognili vplivu spontanega izzvenevanja. Otroci so bili v terapijo vključeni približno eno leto. Nato so bili retestirani s Stuttering Svereity Instrument – 3 (Riley, 1994). Rezultati so pokazali, da obstajajo razlike v uspešnosti terapije glede na opazovane prediktorje, ki pa niso statistično značilne. Povezanost med prediktorji in uspešnostjo terapije se ni izkazala za statistično pomembno.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Kotolenko]
Year:2011
Number of pages:54 f.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-68055 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616.89-008.434-053.4(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:8901449 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.07.2015
Views:1479
Downloads:211
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Predictors of effectiveness of stuttering therapy for preschool children
Abstract:
The aim of this research work was to verify the effectiveness of direct therapy for preschool children who stutter according to the following predictors: types of disfluency, sex and temperament. The research work was carried out at Center za sluh in govor Maribor. The sample included 34 preschool children whose first occurrence of stuttering had appeared during their 2nd and 4th year and lasted for at least 6 months before the therapy started. In this way we avoided the impact of natural recovery. Children participated in the therapy for approximately one year. After that they were re-tested with Stuttering Severity Instrument – 3 (Riley, 1994). The results, according to the predictors showed that there are some differences in intensity of stuttering after the therapy; however, they are not statistically significant. The correlation between the predictors and intensity of stuttering after the therapy did not appear to be statistically significant.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back