izpis_h1_title_alt

Teorija in praksa definiranja religije
Črnič, Aleš (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/tip/tip20016Crnic.PDF New window

Abstract
Definicij religije ne uporablja zgolj akademsko okolje, temveč tudi širša javnost, politika in sodstvo ter različne verske skupnosti. Med tem ko so strokovne (družboslovne) definicije praviloma odprte in zajemajo večino delujočih novih religijskih gibanj, so na drugi strani popularne definicije občutno ožje in dovoljujejo le malo odstopanja od prevladujočih krščanskih oblik religije. Institucionalne definicije pa običajno iščejo pravo mero med strokovnimi in popularnimi definicijami. Kljub očitni nezmožnosti oblikovanja univerzalno veljavne definicije, družboslovci ne bi smeli odstopiti od ambicije definiranja religije, pri čemer bi veljalo upoštevati pragmatičen pristop, ki izhaja predvsem iz koristnosti določene definicije v določenem kontekstu.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized (r6)
Tipology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2001
Number of pages:str. 1004-1016
Numbering:Let. 38, št. 6
UDC:316.334
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:20914013 Link is opened in a new window
Views:827
Downloads:66
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share: Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Visoka šola za politične vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 New window

Secondary language

Language:Unknown
Abstract:
Definitions of religion are not used only by scholars but also by a wider public, politics, law and various religious communities. In contrast to the scientific definitions, which are as a rule open, including a majority of the active new religious movements, popular definitions are considerably narrower,allowing only slight deviations from the dominating Christian forms of religion. Institutional definitions usually aim at the middle way between the expert and the popular definitions. Despite the apparent inability to forma universally valid definition, social scientists should not withdraw the ambition to define religion. However, a pragmatic approach, which derives fromthe usefulness of a particular definition in a certain context, should be taken into account.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back