izpis_h1_title_alt

Detection and comparison of the sensory quality of wild and farmed brown trout (Salmo trutta) by consumers
ID Pohar, Jurij (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://aas.bf.uni-lj.si/zootehnika/98-2011/PDF/98-2011-1-45-50.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
To compare the sensorial quality of wild and farmed brown trout 34 consumer were asked to decide which of the two samples presented to them in double blind test was preferred regarding appearance, aroma, juiciness, mouth feeling and general impression if difference in mentioned traits between both samples was detected. Results showed that for all traits at least 75% of consumers stated that they noticed difference. For appearance and aroma wild trout was preferred, for juiciness and mouth feeling farmed trout was favored. General impression of wild brown trout was favored by 15 consumers, while 16 consumers regarding this trait preferred farmed brown trout. Meaning and importance of results from consumers' panel test for positioning of products from fish farming and fisherz is discussed.

Language:English
Keywords:fish, brown trout, Salmo trutta, sensory quality, consumers, farming, fisheries
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:2011
Number of pages:Str. 45-50
Numbering:Letn. 98, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-384-f7bfa025-769f-5c76-ca2f-045349bf564b This link opens in a new window
UDC:641
ISSN on article:1581-9175
COBISS.SI-ID:2899848 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.07.2014
Views:1829
Downloads:467
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Acta agriculturae Slovenica
Shortened title:Acta agric. Slov.
Publisher:Biotehniška fakulteta
ISSN:1581-9175
COBISS.SI-ID:213840640 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:
V dvojnem slepem testu smo 34 porabnikov zaprosili, da povedo, ali so zaznali razlike glede izgleda, arome, sočnosti, okusa v ustih in splošnega vtisa med prostoživečimi potočnimi postrvmi in v ribogojnici vzrejenimi potočnimi postrvmi. Tiste, ki so razlike zaznali, smo zaprosili, naj povedo kateri od obeh vzorcev je bil glede na omenjene lastnosti po njihovem mnenju boljši. Rezultati so pokazali, da je za vsako od lastnosti najmanj 75 % porabnikov menilo, da so zaznali razliko med obema vzorcema. Glede izgleda in arome so dali prednost prostoživečim postrvim, glede sočnosti in okusa vzrejenim postrvim, glede splošnega vtisa pa je 15 porabnikov dalo prednost prostoživečim in 16 vzrejenim ribam. Pomen in pomembnost rezultatov, ki jih dobimo s tovrstnimi testi pri porabnikih smo vrednotili v kontekstu pozicioniranja rib in izdelkov, ki izvirajo iz akvakulture ali ribištva.

Keywords:ribe, potočna postrv, Salmo trutta, senzorična kakovost, porabniki, reja, ribolov

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back