izpis_h1_title_alt

Analiza sodnih primerov evidentiranja nepremičnin na območju Geodetske pisarne Ljubljana : diplomska naloga
Pirnat, Tina (Author), Lisec, Anka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, Čeh, Marjan (Co-mentor), Perpar, Igor (Co-mentor), Kosmatin Fras, Mojca (Thesis defence commission member), Kuhar, Miran (Thesis defence commission member), Kogoj, Dušan (Thesis defence commission member)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://drugg.fgg.uni-lj.si/3981/ This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,90 MB)

Abstract
Na osnovi izkušenj preteklih let Geodetske pisarne (GP) Ljubljana v diplomski nalogi izpostavimo aktualne probleme evidentiranja sodno določenih mej v zemljiškem katastru na območju katastrskih občin, ki jih pisarna geografsko obsega. Za namen razumevanja poteka in vsebine posameznega obravnavanega postopka predstavimo zakonodajo, ki ureja področje nepravdnega postopka urejanja mej zemljiških parcel v Sloveniji. V praktičnem delu vsebinsko in časovno analiziramo izbrane elaborate sodnih postopkov, ki so bili na podlagi dokončne odločbe geodetske uprave o evidentiranju urejene meje zaključeni po sprejetju Zakona o evidentiranju nepremičnin (ZEN) leta 2006. Največ sodnih postopkov ureditve meje je bilo evidentiranih v letu 2011, spremembe, določene v pravnomočnih sodnih aktih teh postopkov, pa so se najpogosteje v zemljiški kataster evidentirale v roku petih let ali manj. V nalogi izpostavljamo tipične probleme in tehnične napake elaboratov sodnega postopka ureditve meje ter razloge za poziv k dopolnitvi elaboratov, s katerimi se srečujejo geodeti v Geodetski pisarni Ljubljana. Najpogostejši razlog za pošiljanje poziva za dopolnitev elaborata je neskladnost vsebine elaborata in vsebine sodnega sklepa na podlagi katerega se zahteva evidentiranje sprememb v zemljiškem katastru. Obravnavamo tudi primera elaboratov sodno določenih mej, ki nista izpolnjevala določil Pravilnika o urejanju mej ter spreminjanju in evidentiranju podatkov v zemljiškem katastru (2007) in je bila posledično zahtevana dopolnitev elaboratov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:geodezija, diplomska dela, UNI, GIG, evidentiranje nepremičnin, zemljiški kataster, sodišče, sodni izvedenec, katastrski elaborati, jsodni postopek določitve meje, Geodetska pisarna Ljubljana
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper (mb11)
Tipology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Year:2012
Publisher:[T. Pirnat]
Number of pages:VII, 29 str.
Place:Ljubljana
UDC:528.4:711(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:6010465 Link is opened in a new window
Views:1272
Downloads:445
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The analysis of judicial cases for real property evidencing in the area of SMAbranch office of Ljubljana
Abstract:
This thesis is an attempt to present some current issues based on experiences of Ljubljana SMA branch office in the field of judicial definitions of borders in a cadastral register of cadastral municipalities in the geographic scope of branch office. To acheive detail understanding of the timeline and the content of each particular proceeding we present the legislation concerning non-contentious procedure of managing land boundaries in Slovenia. In the practical part of the thesis we analyze the court expert's reports of judicial definition of land boundaries which were based on the final order of the Surveying and mapping authority, concluded and recorded after the adoption of the Real-Estate Recording Act in 2006. Most analysed proceedings, regarding the judicial definition of boundaries, were recorded in 2011, changes specified in final judicial acts of these procedures were in a cadastral register mostly recorded within five years or less. In the thesis we focus on the most common issues and technical mistakes in the surveyors reports of judicial definition of land boundaries and the cause for their reasons for the request to complete the report, encountered by surveyors at Ljubljana SMA branch office. The main cause for sending an appeal for completion of the reports is incosistency of the contents in the surveyors report and the content of judicial conclusion of the court. We have discussed two reports of judicial definiton of land boundaries which have not met the rules and was subsequently required for an update of reports.

Keywords:graduation thesis, geodesy, real property evidencing, land cadastre, court, court expert, cadastral documentation, judicial clarification of boundaries, SMA branch office of Ljubljana

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back