izpis_h1_title_alt

Primerjava med kompaktnimi, grajenimi in rastlinskimi čistilnimi napravami : diplomska naloga
ID Pečečnik, Denis (Author), ID Panjan, Jože (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Krzyk, Mario (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,93 MB)
MD5: B91C97BA4C7C1F91BC81D17664B98463
PID: 20.500.12556/rul/f08451f1-4543-47cc-9764-bae3159df661

Abstract
V diplomski nalogi obravnavamo male komunalne čistilne naprave (MČN) do 2000 PE, pri čemer se osredotočamo na medsebojno primerjavo različnih tipov in si prizadevamo izluščiti najboljše opcije, ki so na voljo slovenskemu uporabniku. Medtem ko različni tipi MČN delujejo po različnih principih, sta s stališča uporabe pomembna zlasti okolijski in ekonomski vidik. Kot najbolj učinkovite se pri tem izkažejo rastlinske in lagunske MČN, vendar je njihova uporaba omejena s prostorskega in kapacitetnega vidika. V kolikor te omejitve niso problematične, predstavljajo rastlinske in lagunske MČN rešitev, ki ne zahteva kompleksnih izvajalnih del, visokih investicijskih stroškov, električne energije za obratovanje in hkrati ne predstavlja posega v krajinsko okolje.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gradbeništvo, diplomska naloga, UNI, vodarstvo in komunalno inženirstvo, VKI, čistilna naprava, male čistilne naprave, rastlinske čistilne naprave, lagunske čistilne naprave, čiščenje odpadnih voda, SBR, biofilter, nepretočne greznice
Work type:Undergraduate thesis
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[D. Pečečnik]
Year:2014
Number of pages:X, 70 str., 6 pril.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-32494 This link opens in a new window
UDC:628.32(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:6869345 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.07.2015
Views:4351
Downloads:615
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Wetlands, compact and built water treatment systems
Abstract:
In the thesis we discuss small waste water treatment plants (WWTP) up to 2000 PE and we focus on the comparison of different types and strive to extract the best available options for Slovenian users. While different types of WWTP operate on different principles, the particularly important point of use are the enviromantal and economic aspects. In this regard, the most effective are shown to be plant and lagoon WWTP, but their use is limited by the spatial and capacity aspects. If these restrictions are not problematic, plant and lagoon WWTP are representing a solution, that doesn't require complex executable part, high investment costs and electricity for operation and at the same time does not constitute interference in the landscape environment.

Keywords:graduation thesis, small wastewater treatment systems, constructed wetlands, lagoon wastewater treatment plant, SBR, biofilter, septic tanks

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back