izpis_h1_title_alt

Vrnitev k praxisu in mišljenju revolucije - prispevek k razpravi o prihodnosti demokracije
ID Vodovnik, Žiga (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20095_Vodovnik.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Članek se ukvarja z vprašanjem stanja in perspektiv demokracije in ob tem aktualne teze o krizi demokracije preverja skozi kategorije in koncepte praxis-filozofije. Avtor konstatira, da razumevanje demokracije kot praxisa - kot svobodne in kreativne dejavnosti v vsakdanjem življenju - in ne kot prefabriciranega institucionalnega dizajna nujno vodi v negacijo teze o krizi demokracije. Da navkljub vzponu in krepitvi (participativne) demokracije, ki smo ji bili priča v zadnjih letih, krizo obstoječega ekonomskega projekta in etatizma razumemo tudi že kot krizo demokracije, po avtorjevem prepričanju še najboljše dokazuje miopijo (ne)razumevanja bistva demokracije, zaradi česar jo še vedno iščemo na mestih, kjer je najmanjša možnost, da jo bomo tudi našli.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2009
Number of pages:Str. 577-592
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-23042 This link opens in a new window
UDC:321.7
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:29004637 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.07.2014
Views:907
Downloads:106
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a proceedings

Title:[Konec demokracije? Možne nove paradigme]
COBISS.SI-ID:29003357 This link opens in a new window

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
The article addresses the question of the conditions and perspectives of democracy, and then analyses the thesis about the crisis of democracy employing categories and concepts developed by the Praxis philosophy. The author concludes that interpreting democracy as praxis - free and creative activity in everyday life - and not as a prefabricated institutional design results in a rejection of thesis about the crisis of democracy. In spite of the development and enhancement of (direct) democracy in recent years, we interpret the crisis of the current economic paradigm and etatism already as a crisis of democracy itself. This is, according to the author, the best possible confirmation of the myopia in our (mis)understandings of democracy, and why we are still searching for it precisely where we are least likely to find it.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back