izpis_h1_title_alt

Meje rasti, ocena tisočletja, indeks okoljske trajnosti in indeks okoljske uspešnosti
ID Kirn, Andrej (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20065-6_Kirn.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Avtor primerja študije Meje rasti (LTG), Ocena tisočletja (MA), Indeks okoljske trajnosti (ESI) in Indeks okoljske uspešnosti (EPI). Vse odmislijo vpliv sodobne kapitalistične oblike lastnine in produkcije na naravo/okolje. Razen študije Meje rasti so tudi vse umeščene znotraj paradigme ekonomske rasti. Računalniški scenariji v Oceni tisočletja ne vodijo k dramatičnemu upadu človeške blaginje zaradi sprememb v ekosistemih, ki jih je povzročila ekonomska rast. V njih ni upoštevana predpostavka o mejah ekosistemov in njihovih storitvah, ki ne dopuščajo trajne ekonomske rasti. V tem je bistvena razlika med Mejami rasti in Oceno tisočletja. Študiji ESI in EPI sta bolj upravljavsko usmerjeni kot pa LTG in MA, čeprav tudi te dve poudarjata nujnost sprememb in ukrepov za prehod k ekosocialni trajnostni družbi. Vsi ukrepi MA, EPI, ESI neizrečeno dopuščajo, da je možno zmanjšati ali celo preprečiti degradacijo narave znotraj paradigme rasti in kapitala. Samo LTG predpostavlja najbolj reformiran ekokapitalizem, to je nerastoči kapital.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2006
Number of pages:Str. 658-673
Numbering:Vol. 43, št. 5/6
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-22529 This link opens in a new window
UDC:504:330.34
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:25643613 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.07.2014
Views:1680
Downloads:216
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Visoka šola za politične vede, Visoka šola za politične vede, Visoka šola za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo, Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo, Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
The author compares the following studies: Limits to Growth (LTG), Millennium Assessment (MA), Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) and Environment Performance Index (EPI). All the studies ignore the impact that the modern capitalist form of property and production has on nature/environment. Except the LTG study, all the other studies are embedded within the economic growth paradigm. The computer scenarios in the MA study do not lead to a dramatic decline of human welfare caused by changes in ecosystems assigned to economic growth. The reason for such an outcome in the MA study is that no account was taken of limitations of ecosystems and their services which cannot sustain permanent economic growth. This is the basic difference between the LTG and the MA study. The ESI and EPI studies are more management-oriented than the LTG one even though the former two studies also stress the need for a change and steps towards an eco-social sustainable society. All the measures of the MA, EPI and ESI are implicitly in line with the notion that reduction or even prevention of the degradation of nature can be achieved within the paradigm of growth and capital. Only the LTG study presupposes the most reformed eco-capitalism i.e. non-growing capital.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back