izpis_h1_title_alt

Zanesljivost in veljavnost v kvalitativnem in kvantitativnem raziskovanju
ID Kogovšek, Tina (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20051_Kogovsek.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Eno od temeljnih vprašanj na področju metodologije je kakovost raziskovalnih izsledkov. V članku so predstavljeni in kritično ovrednoteni koncepti preverjanja kakovosti v kvantitativnem in kvalitativnem raziskovanju, pri čemer je večji poudarek na slednjem. Avtorica med drugim ugotavlja, da se v zadnjem času tudi v kvalitativnem raziskovanju poskušajo vzpostaviti jasnejši in sistematičnejši standardi kakovosti izsledkov ter da je stereotipna opredelitev kvantitativnega raziskovanja kot zanesljivejšega in kvalitativnegakot veljavnejšega preveč poenostavljena. Viden je tudi trend preseganja ločevanja teh dveh pristopov ter odločanje za takšen pristop (ali kombinacijo pristopov), ki je najprimernejši za določen raziskovalni problem. Ne glede na to, kateri pristop je uporabljen, pa je potrebno zadostiti jasnim standardom kakovosti raziskovalnih izsledkov.

Language:Slovenian
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2005
Number of pages:Str. 256-278
Numbering:Letn. 42, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-22428 This link opens in a new window
UDC:303
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:23912029 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.07.2014
Views:2868
Downloads:306
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
Quality of research findings is one of the basic issues in the field of methodology. In the paper concepts of quality in quantitative and qualitative research are presented and critically evaluated, with a greater emphasis on the latter. Among other findings, the author claims that recent efforts withinqualitative research strive toward clearer and more systematic standardsof quality of research and that stereotypical definition of quantitative research as more reliable and of qualitative research as more valid is oversimplified. There has also been a visible trend of overcoming strict separation of these two approaches and applying the approach (or combining approaches) that is the most appropriate for a certain research problem. Regardless of which approach is used, it is necessary to apply clear standards of quality of research findings.


Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back