izpis_h1_title_alt

Postmoderno prostorsko planiranje
Kos, Drago (Author)

URLURL - Presentation file, Visit http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/tip20034kos.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Kriza prostorskega planiranja je za nekatere logična posledica prehoda iz moderne v postmoderno družbo. V novih pogojih je težko izvajati hierarhizirano formalno sistemsko družbeno regulacijo, ker je ena temeljnih značilnosti postmoderne individualizirana raznovrstnost, ki prinaša nestabilnost in nepredvidljivost. Toge formalne procedure zato težko dosegajo legitimnost. Razprava pritrjuje tezam, da je vseobsežno prostorsko planiranje neperspektivno in neuresničljivo. Vendar pa to ne pomeni, da prostorsko planiranje ni več potrebno in aktualno. V sklepu razprave je poudarjeno, da semora prostorsko planiranje odpreti, demokratizirati in preobraziti v odprto "soodločevalsko" planiranje. Takšno "postmoderno" planiranje je operativno in obenem sposobno dosegati legitimnost.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:postmoderna, legitimnost, odločanje
Work type:Not categorized (r6)
Tipology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Year:2003
Number of pages:Str. 647-657
Numbering:Letn. 40, št. 4
UDC:71/72
ISSN on article:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:22298717 This link opens in a new window
Views:975
Downloads:141
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
 
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only to logged in users.
:
Share:AddThis
AddThis uses cookies that require your consent. Edit consent...

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Visoka šola za politične vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Abstract:
Some see the crisis of spatial planning as a logical consequence of transitionfrom modernity to posmodern society. In the new conditions, the hierarchic formal systemic social regulation becomes difficult to carry out because of the basic feature of the postmodernity - an individualised plurality, which brings instability and unpredictability. Rigid formal procedures thus hardly reach legitimacy. The debate confirms the ideas that all embracing spatial planning does not have the future and is not feasible. However, this does not mean that spatial planning is not topical and necessary. The author concludes that the spatial planning must open up, it hasto democratise and transform into an open planning. Such 'postmodern' planning is operative and at the same time able to reach legitimacy.

Keywords:postmodernity, legitimity, decision-making

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Comments

Leave comment

You have to log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back