Details

Laozi’s intercultural reception : a journey from Europe to Latin America
ID Costantini, Filippo (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (705,73 KB)
MD5: 7BA2C021FBB3E8B9727C08193A1C8026
URLURL - Source URL, Visit http://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/22266 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
At the turn of the 20th century, Latin American publishers began producing Spanish translations of Asian philosophical and religious classics, reflecting a growing fascination with Oriental cultures. This surge in publications was fuelled by emerging transnational esoteric, intellectual, and artistic networks. Among these texts, the Laozi stands out for its remarkable adaptability, undergoing multiple interpretative shifts to align with diverse cultural and intellectual frameworks. This paper investigates the intercultural reception of the Laozi in Latin America, fo­cusing on how European intellectual networks mediated its translation, interpretation, and domestication in the region. Through a comparative analysis of three paradigmat­ic retranslations—Edmundo Montagne’s anarchist-spiritual rendition, Adolfo Carpio’s metaphysical reading, and Onorio Ferrero’s traditionalist interpretation—the study traces the text’s transatlantic trajectories and its reframing for Latin American audiences. Each translation reflects a distinct interpretative approach shaped by the author’s intellectual background and objectives. Collectively, they demonstrate how translators negotiated European frameworks while addressing local intellectual concerns, from critiques of Western modernity to postcolonial re-evaluations of non-Western epistemologies that remained entangled with colonial knowledge hierarchies. By analysing these cases, this paper highlights the complexities behind the reception of Daoism in Latin America, underscoring the entrenched power imbalances within the broader intellectual networks that linked the region with Europe. These dynamics con­tributed to the global circulation and reinterpretation of this Daoist classic, revealing how even anti-colonial critiques often relied on Eurocentric paradigms to legitimize non-Western thought.

Language:English
Keywords:Chinese philosophy, Daoism, Laozi, Latin America, translation
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 415-437
Numbering:Vol. 14, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-190566 This link opens in a new window
ISSN on article:2232-5131
DOI:10.4312/as.2026.14.2.415-437 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.11.2026
Views:41
Downloads:3
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Asian studies = Azijske študije
Publisher:Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:2232-5131
COBISS.SI-ID:265206272 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Medkulturni sprejem Laozija : potovanje iz Evrope v Latinsko Ameriko
Abstract:
Na prelomu 20. stoletja so latinskoameriški založniki začeli izdajati španske prevode azijskih filozofskih in verskih klasikov, kar odraža naraščajoče zanimanje za orientalske kulture. Ta porast števila publikacij so poganjale novonastale transnacionalne ezoterične, intelektualne in umetniške mreže. Med omenjenimi besedili s svojo izjemno prilagodlji­vostjo izstopa Laozi, ki je doživel več interpretativnih premikov, s katerimi se je prilaga­jal različnim kulturnim in intelektualnim okvirom. Članek raziskuje medkulturni sprejem Laozija v Latinski Ameriki, osredotoča pa se na to, kako so evropske intelektualne mreže posredovale prevod, interpretacijo in udomači­tev besedila v regiji. S pomočjo primerjalne analize treh posodobljenih paradigmatskih prevodov – anarhistično-duhovne interpretacije Edmunda Montagneja, metafizične inter­pretacije Adolfa Carpia in tradicionalistične interpretacije Onoria Ferrera – študija sledi transatlantski poti besedila ter njegovemu preoblikovanju za latinskoameriško občinstvo. Vsak prevod odraža svojstven interpretativni pristop, ki so ga izoblikovali avtorjevo in­telektualno ozadje in cilji. Prevodi skupaj kažejo, kako so se prevajalci spoprijemali z evropskimi okviri, obenem pa naslavljali lokalna intelektualna vprašanja – od kritike za­hodne modernosti do postkolonialnih reevalvacij nezahodnih epistemologij, ki so ostale zapletene v mrežo kolonialnih hierarhij znanja. Na podlagi analize omenjenih primerov članek izpostavlja kompleksnost sprejemanja daoizma v Latinski Ameriki ter izpostavlja globoko zakoreninjena neravnovesja moči znotraj širših intelektualnih mrež, ki so povezovale to regijo z Evropo. Ta dinamika je prispevala h globalnemu kroženju in ponovni interpretaciji omenjenega daoističnega kla­sika, pri čemer pa je razkrila, da so se, da bi legitimirale nezahodno miselnost, celo pro­tikolonialne kritike pogosto opirale na evrocentrične paradigme.

Keywords:kitajska filozofija, daoizem, Laozi, Latinska Amerika, prevod

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Asian studies

Back