Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Dialogic artificial intelligence in the architectural design studio : an empirical study of the AI sparring model
ID
Stanimirović, Mirko
(
Author
),
ID
Wang, Jiaqi
(
Author
),
ID
Zupančič, Domen
(
Author
),
ID
Momčilović-Petronijević, Ana
(
Author
),
ID
Ćirić, Ivan
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(8,22 MB)
MD5: A7C35289A3F017817B35841449D5F061
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/16/14/2878
Image galllery
Abstract
Integrating generative artificial intelligence into architectural education raises a question not only of whether AI helps, but of how its use should be structured. This paper empirically examines the AI Sparring model—a dialogic, critical approach to student–AI interaction—through a workshop in which architecture students designed a pavilion in a fortress. The three self-selected groups differed in the role AI played in the formation of the concept, not in its final presentation: Group A developed concepts traditionally, through sketches and physical working models, with AI serving only as a rendering tool at the end; Group B used AI directly as a generative tool; and Group C worked through structured critical dialogue with AI. The works were independently rated by three evaluators from three countries, alongside keyword analysis and assessment of reflective depth and theoretical references. Group C produced the most consistent concept quality, with no weak works, yet the single highest-rated work came from the traditional group—Sparring raises the “floor” rather than the “ceiling” of quality. At the same time, Group C reported the lowest sense of authorship, and qualitative analysis revealed “simulated depth”: theoretical references cited without genuine engagement. Because of the small, self-selected samples, the findings are read as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The paper sheds light on the limits of reflective AI pedagogy and proposes concrete revisions to the model.
Language:
English
Keywords:
artificial intelligence
,
architectural education
,
AI sparring
,
critical thinking
,
reflective practice
,
generative AI
,
design studio
,
authorship
,
AI colab
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FA - Faculty of Architecture
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
19.07.2026
Year:
2026
Number of pages:
23 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 16, iss. 14, [article no.] 2878
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-188387
UDC:
004.8:72:37
ISSN on article:
2075-5309
DOI:
10.3390/buildings16142878
COBISS.SI-ID:
291619587
Publication date in RUL:
22.09.2026
Views:
164
Downloads:
39
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Buildings
Shortened title:
Buildings
Publisher:
Molecular Diversity Preservation International
ISSN:
2075-5309
COBISS.SI-ID:
1024478292
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
umetna inteligenca
,
arhitekturno izobraževanje
,
sodelovanje z UI
,
kritično mišljenje
,
reflektivna praksa
,
generativna UI
,
avtorstvo
,
sodelo z UI
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back