Details

Dialogic artificial intelligence in the architectural design studio : an empirical study of the AI sparring model
ID Stanimirović, Mirko (Author), ID Wang, Jiaqi (Author), ID Zupančič, Domen (Author), ID Momčilović-Petronijević, Ana (Author), ID Ćirić, Ivan (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (8,22 MB)
MD5: A7C35289A3F017817B35841449D5F061
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/16/14/2878 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Integrating generative artificial intelligence into architectural education raises a question not only of whether AI helps, but of how its use should be structured. This paper empirically examines the AI Sparring model—a dialogic, critical approach to student–AI interaction—through a workshop in which architecture students designed a pavilion in a fortress. The three self-selected groups differed in the role AI played in the formation of the concept, not in its final presentation: Group A developed concepts traditionally, through sketches and physical working models, with AI serving only as a rendering tool at the end; Group B used AI directly as a generative tool; and Group C worked through structured critical dialogue with AI. The works were independently rated by three evaluators from three countries, alongside keyword analysis and assessment of reflective depth and theoretical references. Group C produced the most consistent concept quality, with no weak works, yet the single highest-rated work came from the traditional group—Sparring raises the “floor” rather than the “ceiling” of quality. At the same time, Group C reported the lowest sense of authorship, and qualitative analysis revealed “simulated depth”: theoretical references cited without genuine engagement. Because of the small, self-selected samples, the findings are read as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The paper sheds light on the limits of reflective AI pedagogy and proposes concrete revisions to the model.

Language:English
Keywords:artificial intelligence, architectural education, AI sparring, critical thinking, reflective practice, generative AI, design studio, authorship, AI colab
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FA - Faculty of Architecture
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:19.07.2026
Year:2026
Number of pages:23 str.
Numbering:Vol. 16, iss. 14, [article no.] 2878
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-188387 This link opens in a new window
UDC:004.8:72:37
ISSN on article:2075-5309
DOI:10.3390/buildings16142878 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:291619587 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:22.09.2026
Views:164
Downloads:39
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Buildings
Shortened title:Buildings
Publisher:Molecular Diversity Preservation International
ISSN:2075-5309
COBISS.SI-ID:1024478292 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:umetna inteligenca, arhitekturno izobraževanje, sodelovanje z UI, kritično mišljenje, reflektivna praksa, generativna UI, avtorstvo, sodelo z UI

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back