Introduction: Brain tumors are a serious pathology which can affect children and adults, no regard to their age. Different radiologic modalities are used for discovering them, but because the brain is comprised of soft tissues, the most commonly used method is magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is a safe imaging method because it does not use any ionising radiation to obtain images. Due to differences in the anatomy and composition of pediatric and adult brains, the imaging protocols differ. In the introduction, we showcase different sequences used in the protocols as part of imaging of the brain. These were later compared. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to present and compare the protocol for imaging of brain tumors in children and adults as well as to highlight the significance of magnetic resonance imaging in this field and find the differences in imaging pediatric and adult brains. Methods: The methodology consisted of a cross sectional review in which magnetic resonance imaging protocols were compared. The study was supported by literature obtained from various databases, representing the descriptive method. The databases used were: Google Scholar, Science Direct, CINAHL and PubMed. The keywords used to search for relevant articles were in the slovenian and english language. The protocol for pediatric brain imaging was provided by the Pediatric clinic of Ljubljana and the protocol for adult brain imaging was provided by the Neurological clinic of Ljubljana. Results: In the results we presented two different brain tumor imaging protocols. Their comparison included different pulse sequences, such as: T1, T2 Turbo Spin Echo, T1 Spin Echo, T1 and T1 post contrast, diffusion weighted imaging and susceptibility weighted imaging. For each individual sequence we presented the repetition time, echo time, inversion time, size of imaging field, size of pixel, slice gap, number of averages and time of acquisition. Discussion and conclusion: Comparison of the two protocols revealed certain differences that are the result of adaptations to the characteristics of pediatric and adult brains. Protocols described in the foreign literature do not significantly differ from the compared protocols.
|