Details

Bosanski upor (1831–1832) v primerjalni perspektivi: Husein Gradaščević in odpor pokrajinskih elit proti osmanski centralizaciji
ID Markežič, Andrej (Author), ID Stergar, Rok (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (210,07 KB)
MD5: 882D099063D2C5D2FFF1171C4BD718B8

Abstract
Težnja vsake uspešne in racionalne politične enote je, da z najmanjšo možno porabo sredstev doseže na najbolj učinkovit način največje uspehe. Na poti do napredka se bodo vedno našli posamezniki, ki bodo izkoristili nefunkcionalnost sistema sebi v prid. Maḥmûd-u s̠ânî se glasi ime bistrega in sposobnega osmanskega sultana, ki je vladal Vzvišeni državi, ko je nujno potrebovala reforme. Mnogi veljaki, ajani in janičarji so uživali v obdobju decentralizirane in nemočne vladavine. Razumljivo je, zakaj so se mnogi uprli modernizaciji, ki jo je Visoka Porta v Konstantinoplu poskušala uveljaviti v celotnem cesarstvu. V diplomski nalogi bomo obravnavali dogajanje na območju Bosanskega pašaluka v prvi polovici 19. stoletja s poudarkom na uporu Husein-bega Gradaščevića, »Bosanskega zmaja«. Bosanski upor bo umeščen v širši kontekst uporov na zahodnem Balkanu, pri čemer bomo primerjalno analizirali njihove vzroke, potek in rezultate ter pojasnili, zakaj so bili nekateri uspešnejši od drugih.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Husein Kapetan Gradaščević, bosanski upor, Bosanski pašaluk, Mahmud II., janičarji, avtonomija, centralizacija, reforme
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2026
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-187407 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.09.2026
Views:145
Downloads:61
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The Bosnian Uprising (1831–1832) in Comparative Perspective: Husein Gradaščević and Provincial Elites’ Resistance to Ottoman Centralization
Abstract:
The tendency of every successful and rational political entity is to achieve the greatest possible success in the most efficient manner while expending the lowest possible number of resources. On the path toward progress, there will always be individuals who exploit the dysfunctionality of the system for their own benefit. Maḥmûd II was the name of the intelligent and capable Ottoman Sultan who ruled the Sublime State at a time when it was in urgent need of reforms. Many dignitaries, ayans, and Janissaries benefited from a period of decentralized and weak governance. It is understandable why many resisted the modernisation that the Sublime Porte in Constantinople attempted to implement throughout the empire. This thesis examines the developments in the Bosnia Eyalet during the first half of the nineteenth century, with particular emphasis on the revolt led by Husein-beg Gradaščević, the "Dragon of Bosnia." The Bosnian uprising will be situated within the broader context of the uprisings that took place across the Western Balkans. Through a comparative analysis of their causes, course, and outcomes, the thesis seeks to explain why some of these uprisings proved more successful than others.

Keywords:Husein Kapetan Gradaščević, Bosnian Uprising, Bosnian Pashalik, Mahmud II, Janissaries, autonomy, centralisation, reforms

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back