Details

On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies – insights from home-cage monitoring
ID Čater, Maša (Author), ID Dušek, Adam (Author), ID Bartelik, Aleksandra (Author), ID Mandillo, Silvia (Author), ID Golini, Elisabetta (Author), ID Rigamonti, Mara (Author), ID Bains, Rasneer Sonia (Author), ID Forrest, Hamish (Author), ID Rivalan, Marion (Author), ID Long, Melissa (Author), ID Kiryk, Anna (Author), ID Lewejohann, Lars (Author), ID Franco, Nuno Henrique (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,53 MB)
MD5: C5B5D0EF81D6294FD308D97E2448EE06
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70184 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
A review of behavioural studies using home-cage monitoring (HCM) systems revealed that over 61% of studies used only male subjects, with only 24% including both sexes, despite evidence of substantial behavioural differences between male and female animals. This bias could influence the outcomes of biomedical research. This preference for male subjects has introduced a significant bias in preclinical animal studies, compromising the generalisability of research findings and potentially overlooking important sex differences in disease manifestation and response to therapies. This review highlights such sex differences in laboratory rodent behaviour, as observed through HCM systems. HCM provides an automated method for observing the behaviour of undisturbed animals in a familiar environment, offering valuable insights into sex-specific differences in behaviour and disease progression. In particular, we emphasise how this technology revealed sex differences in spontaneous activity and behaviour in models of neurodegenerative diseases, while demonstrating that, contrary to common belief, female rodents are not more variable than males in their behaviour. We further discuss the reasons underlying the prevalent sex bias in research and advocate for the inclusion of both sexes in neuroscience and behavioural studies, to enhance the generalisability and informative value of preclinical research, avoid unethical waste of animals and resources, and thereby support the Three Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal use).

Language:English
Keywords:sex differences, animal studies, animal research, preclinical research, biomedical research, behaviour, home-cage monitoring
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 2408-2426
Numbering:Vol. 101, issue 5
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-186705 This link opens in a new window
UDC:57.084
ISSN on article:1469-185X
DOI:10.1002/brv.70184 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:278543875 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:04.09.2026
Views:61
Downloads:15
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Biological reviews
Shortened title:Biol. rev. Camb. Philos. Soc.
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1469-185X
COBISS.SI-ID:517670937 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:monitoring v domači kletki, vpliv spola

Projects

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Project number:CA20135 TEATIME
Name:Improving biomedical research by automated behaviour monitoring in the animal home-cage

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Project number:MZE-RO0723
Name:-
Acronym:-

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back