Introduction: Segmentation is a fundamental process in medical image analysis involving the identification and precise annotations of regions of interest. Manual, semi-automatic, and automatic segmentation are distinguished. MONAI Label is an intelligent tool based on deep neural networks that enables the user to annotate medical images, with labeling applications accessible via a server. Purpose: The aim of this diplomas thesis is to compare the speed and efficiency of different segmentation methods on CT images of the entire spine, enabling
more accurate and easier visualization of vertebrae for clinical practice. For this purpose, we used the 3D Slicer software along with the MONAI Label tools, Auto3Dseg, and region-growing segmentation. Methods: We conducted a literature review, searching primarily English-language sources in international databases on segmentation and its methods. This was followed by a case study in which we used the publicly available TCIA archive to download the CT images. We selected and segmented the first sixteen ABD_LYMPH examinations, covering the mediastinum and abdomen, ensuring that the images included the entire lumbar and thoracic spine as well as part of the cervical spine. Operator one and operator two segmented the CT scans in the same way using semi-automatic and automatic segmentation with the Auto3Dseg tools. We later used the SlicerRT extension to calculate
the Dice similarity coefficient and compared all results. We also performed a statistical analysis of the results using a paired-samples t-test and ANOVA. Results: The data from the semi-automatic and automatic segmentation models (Vertebrae TS2 and Whole Body Segmentation TS2) were divided by the processing time and calculated Dice coefficient. In the second part, the results were compared, presented graphically and we later determined whether statistically significant differences existed. Discussion and conclusion: From our
results, we concluded that the Vertebrae TS2 segmentation model is the fastest and most accurate. The automatic segmentation method labels images more quickly than the semi-automatic method. Its implementation in practice could bring changes to education, diagnostics, and therapy; however, it is necessary to develop appropriate learning strategies.
|