The removal of a child due to domestic violence is one of the most severe measures and one of
the most intensive interventions in family life. It is imposed when a child’s safety and well
being cannot be ensured through less restrictive measures. Although the primary purpose of this
measure is to protect the child, the removal also constitutes a significant turning point for
parents and for the professionals who continue working with the family after the removal.
Working with families following the removal of a child is an important aspect of social work,
as it can contribute to addressing the causes of the child’s endangerment, preventing the
recurrence of violence, and creating conditions for family reunification. At the same time, it is
a professionally demanding field that requires social workers to balance child protection,
support for parents, and cooperation with various institutions.
In this bachelor’s thesis, I explored how professionals at Social Work Centres establish a
working relationship with families following the removal of a child due to domestic violence,
the challenges they encounter in this process, how interinstitutional cooperation is carried out,
and what professionals need in order to provide higher-quality support to affected by violence.
The study was conducted using a qualitative research methodology. Data were collected
through semi-structured interviews with eight professionals employed at Social Work Centres
who work in the field of domestic violence prevention. The collected data were analysed using
open and axial coding.
The findings indicate that establishing a working relationship with families following the
removal of a child is a lengthy and demanding process. Despite initial resistance, professionals
generally succeed in establishing cooperation with families, with empathy, a respectful and
collaborative approach, transparent communication, and persistence playing a crucial role. The
study also revealed that the work is complicated by mental health difficulties, substance abuse,
social hardship, a lack of motivation for change, and various systemic barriers, such as staff
shortages, lengthy procedures, waiting lists, and insufficient placement capacities for children.
Interinstitutional cooperation constitutes an important part of working with families after the
removal of a child and was generally assessed positively by the participants. The professionals
identified several key needs for improving the quality of their work, including increased
staffing, greater accessibility of support programmes, strengthened in-home family support
services, regular and more frequent supervision, and additional psychotherapeutic and systemic
support for professionals.
|