Details

A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis platforms : Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low-moderate risk patients
ID Bunc, Matjaž (Author), ID Steblovnik, Klemen (Author), ID Terseglav, Simon (Author), ID Ambrožič, Jana (Author), ID Bervar, Mojca (Author), ID Dimitrovska, Ljupka (Author), ID Čerček, Miha (Author), ID Kovač, Ana (Author), ID Mohorko-Pleskovič, Patricija (Author), ID Kogoj, Polonca (Author), ID Fras, Zlatko (Author), ID Šušteršič, Miha (Author), ID Vrtovec, Bojan (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,14 MB)
MD5: C7EDF056CDA87CFE7B1633FD507114A7
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/raon-2025-0046 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Background This article compares the real-world performance and safety of the three transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) platforms: Myval, Sapien, and Evolut in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and low to moderate surgical risk. Patients and methods Between September 2019 and September 2023, 1053 TAVI procedures were performed in the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. We used propensity-score match analysis to compare the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut platforms. 180 patients were enrolled in the propensity-score matching study, 60 for each platform. The study endpoints included haemodynamic outcomes compared to baseline, in-hospital clinical safety outcomes, and all-cause mortality at 30 days and one year. Results Changes in peak aortic valve velocity, mean aortic gradient, effective orifice area, and left ventricular ejection fraction were comparable between the platforms. After propensity score matching (tri-match), the rates of stroke (3.4% vs. 3.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.548), life-threatening bleeding (1.7% vs. 1.7% vs. 1.7 %), periprocedural myocardial infarction (3.3% vs. 0.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.330), postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation rate (11.9% vs. 10.2% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.719), all-cause mortality at 30 days (3.3% vs. 5.0% vs. 3.3%; p = 1.000) and at 1 year (8.3% vs. 8.3% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.934) were comparable between the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series, respectively. 2 cases of moderate paravalvular regurgitation were reported, one in Myval, and one in Sapien series. Conclusions The tri-match analysis of the real-world aortic stenosis patients with low to moderate surgical risk treated with the Myval, Sapien, and Evolut series showed comparable performance, safety, efficacy, and survival.

Language:English
Keywords:transcatheter aortic valve implantation, aortic stenosis, real-world comparison
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 498-509, IV
Numbering:Vol. 59, no. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-185581 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616.126
ISSN on article:1318-2099
DOI:10.2478/raon-2025-0046 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:271727107 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.08.2026
Views:49
Downloads:18
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Radiology and oncology
Shortened title:Radiol. oncol.
Publisher:Association of Radiology and Oncology
ISSN:1318-2099
COBISS.SI-ID:32649472 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Primerjava perkutanih aortnih zaklopk Myval, Sapien in Evolut pri simptomatskih bolnikih z aortno stenozo in nizkim do zmernim kirurškim tveganjem
Keywords:perkutana zamenjava aortne zaklopke, aortna stenoza

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back