Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Left bundle branch area pacing vs right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block : the MELOS RELOADED study
ID
Jastrzębski, Marek
(
Author
),
ID
Kiełbasa, Grzegorz
(
Author
),
ID
Cano, Oscar
(
Author
),
ID
Curila, Karol
(
Author
),
ID
Zanon, Francesco
(
Author
),
ID
Žižek, David
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,22 MB)
MD5: 2494A378888D88D70FF4BAC43942CB50
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/47/13/1541/8260797
Image galllery
Abstract
Background and Aims: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) promotes physiological synchronous activation of the left ventricle and may be particularly beneficial in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB), but its mortality benefit remains unclear. This study aims to compare long-term survival in AVB patients receiving either LBBAP or right ventricular pacing (RVP) and to analyse predictors of mortality during LBBAP. Methods: MELOS RELOADED, a multicentre European collaboration, was a registry-based study of pacemaker patients with AVB, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and ventricular pacing >20%. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality based on national registries. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between the RVP and LBBAP groups. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate survival. Results: In total, 3382 patients receiving LBBAP or RVP were matched. At 4-year follow-up, the Kaplan–Meier curve showed an absolute difference in survival of 11.8% in favour of LBBAP (P < .001). LBBAP was a robust predictor of reduced mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.42–0.65, P < .001). Within the LBBAP group, the following independent predictors of increased mortality were identified: lack of confirmed left bundle branch capture (HR 1.85, P < .001), lower percentage of ventricular pacing (HR 1.12), and age. Conclusions: This is the first large study demonstrating the long-term survival benefit of LBBAP. This strengthens the use of LBBAP in AVB patients with preserved/mildly reduced LVEF while awaiting the results of randomized trials. Confirmation of left bundle branch capture seems advisable to achieve optimal results with LBBAP.
Language:
English
Keywords:
conduction system pacing
,
left bundle branch area pacing
,
atrioventricular block
,
mortality
,
heart failure
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2026
Year:
2026
Number of pages:
Str. 1541–1550
Numbering:
Vol. 47, iss. 13
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-185273
UDC:
616.1
ISSN on article:
1522-9645
DOI:
10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf699
COBISS.SI-ID:
258710019
Publication date in RUL:
30.07.2026
Views:
53
Downloads:
7
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
European heart journal
Shortened title:
Eur. heart j.
Publisher:
Oxford University Press, Eureopan Society of Cardiology
ISSN:
1522-9645
COBISS.SI-ID:
515374105
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:
A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back