The master’s thesis examines the correlation between reading literacy and literary empathy in early adolescence. The theoretical part, drawing on literary theory, defines both constructs, while the didactic section contextualises them within the school setting, specifically in the Slovenian language class. The empirical part is based on a survey conducted among 105 seventh-grade students, which included the Interpersonal Reactivity Index questionnaire, two standardised tests of reading literacy as well as a questionnaire about reading habits and attitudes.
Each of the constructs is addressed individually, which is followed by a correlation analysis highlighting their interconnectedness. The results suggest that among the four dimensions of empathy according to Davis (1980), students tend to express the highest level of empathic concern, followed by perspective-taking, fantasy, and lastly, personal distress. Female students displayed higher scores on the fantasy scale. Although female students performed better in the reading literacy tests, no statistically significant differences were found between literary and non-literary texts. Male students performed better on closed-ended questions and tasks at lower cognitive levels while open-ended questions and tasks at higher cognitive levels proved to be more challenging. The correlation analysis confirms a correlation between reading literacy and reading habits and attitudes, which is more pronounced among female students.
The master’s thesis confirms that the development of reading literacy is teachers’ collective responsibility and that intentional inclusion of more challenging tasks, open-ended questions and receptively acceptable texts are crucial for encouraging literary empathy. However, careful selection of texts is not sufficient, teachers must implement appropriate methods for addressing literary works that create space for students to reflect and emotionally engage with literary characters, thereby systematically strengthening literary empathy and broader literary competence.
|