Details

Loving lindens, logging spruces : arborism as an apparatus of arboreal inequality
ID Toplak, Cirila (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (503,77 KB)
MD5: D904925CC7239ECCE0A2D91B93A30353
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.fdv.uni-lj.si/revije/znanstvene-revije/teorija-in-praksa/iz-vsebine/teorija-in-praksa-2-2026 This link opens in a new window
Description: Članek v reviji

Abstract
The article introduces arborism as a conceptual framework for examining how economic, political and cultural practices create hierarchies among species of trees within forest systems. Like with speciesism in critical animal studies, arborism is theorised as a Foucauldian apparatus of power/knowledge that legitimises human-imposed arboreal hierarchies by making certain tree species/individual trees sacred, healing or national icons while others are left invisible or expendable. Drawing on the case of Slovenia’s venerated linden and heavily logged spruce, the article shows how arborism operates through economic logic, nationalist symbolism, heritage protection, and forestry policies. Comparative examples from several other countries reveal the way such hierarchies are reproduced in diverse ecological and cultural contexts. The concept of affective arborism is used to describe the emotional economies that attach value to trees via mourning, memory and awe. Integrating Indigenous ontologies and posthuman relational ethics, the author argues for a post-arborism ethics grounded in reciprocity and multispecies justice rather than charisma or utility.

Language:English
Keywords:arborism, forest governance, posthumanism, multispecies justice, ecological governmentality, sustainable forest management, economic aspects, forestry policy
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Geographic coverage:Slovenija;
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:09.07.2026
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 327-348
Numbering:Letn. 63, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-184775 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630:141.31:316.75(497.4)
ISSN on article:0040-3598
DOI:10.51936/tip.63.2.327 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:284619011 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:15.07.2026
Views:79
Downloads:30
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Ljubimo lipe, sekamo smreke
Abstract:
Članek uvaja arborizem kot konceptualni okvir za preučevanje, kako ekonomske, politične in kulturne prakse ustvarjajo hierarhije med drevesnimi vrstami znotraj gozdnih sistemov. Arborizem, podobno kot specizem v kritičnih študijah živali, je teoretiziran kot foucaultovski dispozitiv oblasti in vednosti, ki upravičuje človeško vzpostavljene hierarhije med drevesnimi vrstami: nekatere drevesne vrste in posamezna drevesa povzdiguje v svete, zdravilne ali nacionalne ikone, druga drevesa pa dela nevidna ali nepotrebna. Članek na primeru čaščene lipe in ekonomsko izkoriščane smreke v Sloveniji analizira, kako arborizem deluje skozi ekonomsko logiko, nacionalistično simboliko, varstvo dediščine in gozdarske politike. Primerjalni primeri iz več drugih držav razkrivajo, kako se drevesne hierarhije reproducirajo v različnih ekoloških in kulturnih kontekstih. Koncept afektivnega arborizma opisuje čustvene razsežnosti, zaradi katerih ljudje vrednotijo drevesa skozi prizmo žalovanja, spominjanja in strahospoštovanja. Na osnovi staroselskih ontologij in posthumanističnega pojmovanja odnosnosti se avtorica v sklepu zavzame za postarboristično etiko, ki bo temeljila na recipročnosti in medvrstni pravičnosti, ne pa na karizmi ali koristnosti dreves.

Keywords:arborizem, gozdarstvo, posthumanizem, medvrstna pravičnost, ekološka vladnost, trajnostno gospodarjenje z gozdovi, gospodarski vidik, gozdarska politika

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back