Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Melatonin vs. dexmedetomidine for sleep induction in children before electroencephalography
ID
Peganc, Katja
(
Author
),
ID
Neubauer, David
(
Author
),
ID
Oražem, Jasna
(
Author
),
ID
Perković-Benedik, Mirjana
(
Author
),
ID
Mahne, Urška
(
Author
),
ID
Bizjak, Neli
(
Author
),
ID
Rener-Primec, Zvonka
(
Author
),
ID
Šuštar, Nataša
(
Author
),
ID
Butenko, Tita
(
Author
),
ID
Vrščaj, Eva
(
Author
),
ID
Osredkar, Damjan
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(625,42 KB)
MD5: B6D04D414DF4B5C085FA04AD1F3F2050
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2024.1362918/full
Image galllery
Abstract
Background and objectives: In children requiring electroencephalography (EEG), sleep recording can provide crucial information. As EEG recordings during spontaneous sleep are not always possible, pharmacological sleepinducing agents are sometimes required. The aim of the study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of melatonin (Mel) and dexmedetomidine (Dex; intranasal and sublingual application) for sleep induction prior to EEG. Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 156 consecutive patients aged 1–19 years were enrolled and randomized by draw into melatonin group (Mel; n = 54; dose: 0.1 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (Dex) sublingual group (DexL; n = 51; dose: 3 mcg/kg) or dexmedetomidine intranasal group (DexN; n = 51; dose: 3 mcg/kg). We compared the groups in several parameters regarding efficacy and safety and also carried out a separate analysis for a subgroup of patients with complex behavioral problems. Results: Sleep was achieved in 93.6% of participants after the first application of the drug and in 99.4% after the application of another if needed. Mel was effective as the first drug in 83.3% and Dex in 99.0% (p < 0.001); in the subgroup of patients with complex developmental problems Mel was effective in 73.4% and Dex in 100% (p < 0.001). The patients fell asleep faster after intranasal application of Dex than after sublingual application (p = 0.006). None of the patients had respiratory depression, bradycardia, desaturation, or hypotension. Conclusions: Mel and Dex are both safe for sleep induction prior to EEG recording in children. Dex is more effective compared to Mel in inducing sleep, also in the subgroup of children with complex behavioral problems.
Language:
English
Keywords:
melatonin
,
dexmedetomidine
,
electroencephalography
,
EEG
,
sleep
,
sleep induction
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
7 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 12, art. 1362918
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-183265
UDC:
616-053.2
ISSN on article:
2296-2360
DOI:
10.3389/fped.2024.1362918
COBISS.SI-ID:
195713539
Publication date in RUL:
10.06.2026
Views:
102
Downloads:
89
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Frontiers in pediatrics
Shortened title:
Front. pediatr.
Publisher:
Frontiers Media S.A.
ISSN:
2296-2360
COBISS.SI-ID:
523096601
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back