Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Biocompatibility and Safety of Orthodontic Clear Aligners and Thermoplastic Retainers : A Systematic In Vitro Review (2015–2025)
ID
Kolenc, Lea
(
Author
),
ID
Oblak, Jan
(
Author
),
ID
Ovsenik, Maja
(
Author
),
ID
Oblak, Čedomir
(
Author
),
ID
Ovsenik, Rok
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(703,56 KB)
MD5: BBBE35104AD3E35B18225EEE64CF81F2
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/23/12494
Image galllery
Abstract
Background: Clear aligners have become a common alternative to fixed appliances for tooth movement, and thermoplastic retainers hold the outcome. The prolonged intraoral contact of these devices has made the materials a focus of biocompatibility research. Objectives: This paper aims to summarize laboratory evidence on the biocompatibility of clear aligners and thermoplastic retainers. Materials included thermoformed polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), multilayer polyurethane, and directly printed resins. Primary outcomes were cytotoxicity, endocrine activity, and chemical or particle release. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through 31 May 2025, and we followed the PRISMA 2020 statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We applied predefined eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened records and extracted data in duplicate, including study design, extraction conditions, surface-area-to-volume ratio (SA/V), cell models, endpoints, and analytical sensitivity as the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). We assessed the risk of bias across seven domains and graded certainty by outcome. We did not register a protocol prospectively. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Materials spanned multilayer polyurethanes (SmartTrack, Clarity), PETG sheets (Essix ACE, Duran), and directly printed resins (Graphy TC-85DAC); a subset tested zinc-oxide (ZnO) nanoparticle coatings. Typical extractions immersed 0.1–1 g of material in cell-culture medium or artificial saliva at 37 °C for 24 h to 30 days. Cell viability usually remained ≥80%. Mild cytotoxicity (about 60–70% viability) appeared with harsher extractions, extended soaks, or an inadequate post-curing of printed parts. The estrogen-sensitive proliferation assay (E-Screen) returned negative results. In saliva-like media, bisphenol A (BPA) and related leachables were undetectable or in the low ng/mL range. In printed resins, urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) sometimes appeared in water extracts, and amounts varied with curing quality. Evidence for chemical leaching and endocrine outcomes is sparse. We found no eligible in vitro study that quantified particle or microplastic release while also measuring a biological endpoint; we discuss particle findings from mechanical wear simulations only as the external context. Limitations: The evidence base is limited to in vitro studies. Many reports incompletely described extraction ratios and processing parameters. Risk of bias and certainty: Most studies used appropriate cell models and controls, but the reporting of surface-area-to-volume ratios, LOD/LOQ, and detailed post-processing parameters was often incomplete. Sample sizes were small, and dynamic wear or enzymatic conditions were uncommon. The overall risk of bias was moderate, and the certainty of evidence was low to moderate due to heterogeneity and in vitro indirectness. Conclusions: Under standard laboratory conditions, clear aligners and thermoplastic retainers show a favorable biocompatibility profile. For printed resins, outcomes depend mainly on processing quality, especially thorough washing and appropriate light-curing parameters. To improve comparability and support clinical translation, we recommend harmonized test protocols, transparent reporting, interlaboratory ring trials, and targeted clinical biomonitoring.
Language:
English
Keywords:
biocompatibility
,
clear aligner
,
thermoplastic retainer
,
cytotoxicity
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.02 - Review Article
Organization:
MF - Faculty of Medicine
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
22 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 15, iss. 23, art. 12494
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-183049
UDC:
616.31
ISSN on article:
2076-3417
DOI:
10.3390/app152312494
COBISS.SI-ID:
278724867
Publication date in RUL:
04.06.2026
Views:
335
Downloads:
140
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Applied sciences
Shortened title:
Appl. sci.
Publisher:
MDPI
ISSN:
2076-3417
COBISS.SI-ID:
522979353
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
biokompatibilnost
,
prozorni aligner
,
termoplastični retainer
,
citotoksičnost
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back