Details

Analiza zdravljenja z zaviralci protonske črpalke pri pacientih, sprejetih v Univerzitetni rehabilitacijski inštitut Republike Slovenije Soča med majem in oktobrom 2025
ID Potočnik, Anja (Author), ID Kerec Kos, Mojca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Milfelner Ferk, Rebeka (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,72 MB)
MD5: 421A26B0400091A7D5D73066E2BACFE1

Abstract
Zaviralci protonske črpalke (ZPČ) sodijo med najpogosteje predpisana zdravila v Sloveniji. Njihova uporaba pogosto ni skladna s smernicami, saj se velikokrat predpisujejo brez jasne indikacije ali dlje od priporočenega obdobja zdravljenja. Namen raziskave je bil opisati značilnosti uporabe ZPČ pri pacientih na rehabilitaciji, oceniti skladnost zdravljenja s smernicami in opredeliti možnosti za odprepisovanje ZPČ ter preveriti klinično pomembne interakcije s sočasno predpisanimi zdravili. V opazovalno prospektivno raziskavo smo vključili 97 odraslih pacientov, hospitaliziranih na Univerzitetnem rehabilitacijskem inštitutu Republike Slovenije Soča med majem in oktobrom 2025, ki so prejemali ZPČ. Podatke o pacientih in njihovem zdravljenju z zdravili smo pridobili iz bolnišničnega informacijskega sistema in pogovora s pacientom. Skladnost zdravljenja z ZPČ smo ocenjevali glede na indikacijo, odmerek in čas trajanja terapije, interakcije med zdravili pa s pomočjo podatkovnih baz UpToDate Lexidrug in Drugs.com. Ob sprejemu je ZPČ prejemalo 58,1 % (97/176) vseh hospitaliziranih pacientov, z mediano starosti 59 let in večjim deležem moških (55/97; 56,7 %). Najpogosteje so prejemali pantoprazol (90/97; 92,8 %), večinoma v dvakratnem odmerku (65/97; 67,0 %) in kot redno terapijo (91/97; 93,8 %). Najpogostejše indikacije so bile preprečevanje neželenih učinkov antiagregacijskih in antikoagulacijskih zdravil (26/97; 26,8 %), gastroezofagealna refluksna bolezen (GERB) (13/97; 13,4 %) in preprečevanje neželenih učinkov nesteroidnih antirevmatikov (11/97; 12,4 %). Pri 35,1 % (35/97) pacientov indikacije za zdravljenje ni bilo mogoče opredeliti. Zdravljenje je bilo v celoti skladno s smernicami pri 23,8 % (15/63) pacientov. Največja odstopanja so bila pri odmerjanju (ustrezen odmerek: 32/63; 50,8 %) in času trajanja terapije v primeru GERB-a (4/13; 30,8 %). Ob odpustu smo pri 67,0 % (65/97) pacientov predlagali zmanjšanje intenzivnosti zdravljenja, pri čemer smo predlagali postopno ukinitev ZPČ pri 49,5 % (48/97) in zmanjšanje odmerka ZPČ pri 17,5 % (17/97) pacientov. Predlogi so bili s strani zdravnikov v celoti sprejeti pri 67,7 % (44/65). Klinično pomembnih interakcij med ZPČ in drugimi zdravilnimi učinkovinami nismo zaznali. Rezultati kažejo, da je uporaba ZPČ pogosto neracionalna, saj se zdravljenje nadaljuje brez ponovne presoje veljavnosti indikacije in potrebe po nadaljevanju terapije. Zato je potrebno redno preverjanje potrebe po zdravljenju ter aktivno zmanjševanje intenzivnosti terapije, s ciljem zagotavljanja varnejše in bolj racionalne uporabe teh zdravil.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:zaviralci protonske črpalke, skladnost zdravljenja s smernicami, odprepisovanje, interakcije
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2026
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-182951 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:29.05.2026
Views:133
Downloads:105
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis of proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients admitted to the University Rehabilitation Institute of the Republic of Slovenia – Soča between May and October 2025
Abstract:
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most frequently prescribed medications in Slovenia. However, their use is often not in accordance with clinical guidelines, as they are often prescribed without a clear indication or continued longer than recommended. The aim of this study was to describe the patterns of PPI use in patients undergoing rehabilitation, to assess the appropriateness of treatment according to clinical guidelines, and to identify opportunities for deprescribing PPIs and evaluating clinically relevant drug interactions with concomitantly prescribed medications. In this observational prospective study, 97 patients over 18 years of age, hospitalized at the University Rehabilitation Institute of the Republic of Slovenia Soča between May and October 2025, and receiving PPIs, were included. Data on patients and their pharmacotherapy were obtained from the hospital information system and patient interviews. Appropriateness of treatment was assessed based on indication, dosage, and duration of therapy, while drug interactions were evaluated using the UpToDate Lexidrug and Drugs.com databases. At admission, 58.1% (97/176) of all hospitalized patients were receiving a PPI, with a median age of 59 years and a higher proportion of men (55/97, 56.7%). The most prescribed PPI was pantoprazole (90/97, 92.8%), predominantly at double doses (65/97, 67.0%) and as regular therapy (91/97, 93.8%). The most common indications were prevention of adverse effects associated with antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (26/97, 26.8%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (13/97, 13.4%) and prevention of adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11/97, 12.4%). In 35.1% (35/97) of patients, no clear indication for treatment could be identified. Overall, treatment was fully guideline-compliant in only 23.8% (15/63) of patients, with the greatest deviations observed in dosing (appropriate dose: 32/63, 50.8%) and duration of therapy in patients with GERD (4/13, 30.8%). At discharge, a reduction in treatment intensity was proposed for 67.0% (65/97) of patients, including gradual discontinuation of PPIs in 49.5% (48/97) and dose reduction in 17.5% (17/97). Of these, 67.7% (44/65) were fully accepted by physicians. No clinically significant interactions between PPIs and other active substances were detected. The results indicate that the use of PPI is often irrational, as treatment is frequently continued without reassessment of its indication and necessity. Therefore, regular evaluation of the need for therapy and active deprescribing strategies are essential to ensure safer and more rational use of these medications.

Keywords:proton pump inhibitors, adherence to guidelines, deprescribing, interactions

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back