Details

Poročanje škodljivih dogodkov: povezanost s psihološko varnostjo, stresom in zadovoljstvom zaposlenih : magistrsko delo
ID Babnik, Ana (Author), ID Kavčič, Tina (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Mlinar, Suzana (Reviewer)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (439,35 KB)
MD5: 5673807011B4733B82A5F8C99E4CC14C

Abstract
Uvod: Zagotavljanje varnosti pacientov je globalna težava, ki vpliva na učinkovitost zdravstvenega varstva v različnih kulturah in družbah. Da bi škodljive dogodke lažje preprečevali, morajo zdravstvene organizacije ustvarjati okolje, ki spodbuja zaposlene, da o svojih napakah, skorajšnjih napakah ali neupoštevanju predpisov spregovorijo. Namen: Namen magistrskega dela je ugotoviti, v kolikšni meri imajo zdravstveni delavci pomisleke o varnosti pacientov ter spregovorijo ali molčijo o morebitnem škodljivem dogodku. Preučevali smo povezanost med temi vedenji, zaznano psihološko varnostjo na delovnem mestu, doživljanjem stresa in zadovoljstvom pri delu zdravstvenih delavcev. Metode dela: Uporabili smo neeksperimentalno kvantitativno metodo raziskovanja. Vzorec je bil pridobljen po principu snežne kepe. Sodelovalo je 165 zdravnikov in medicinskih sester / zdravstvenikov, ki so izpolnili standardizirane samoocenjevalne vprašalnike poročanja o škodljivih dogodkih, psihološki varnosti na delovnem mestu in zaznanem stresu ter ocenili svoje zadovoljstvo pri delu. V analizi smo uporabili metode opisne statistike in izračun korelacijskih koeficientov. Rezultati: Ugotovili smo, da imajo sodelujoči zdravstveni delavci različno pogosto pomisleke o varnosti pacientov, nekateri so jih imeli tudi več kot desetkrat v preteklem mesecu. Glede teh dogodkov v povprečju razmeroma redko molčijo, a tudi razmeroma redko spregovorijo. V povprečju so zdravstveni delavci poročali o razmeroma nizki ravni stresa in precej visoki ravni zadovoljstva pri delu. Splošna in s poročanjem škodljivih dogodkov povezana psihološka varnost sta se negativno povezovali s pogostostjo zaznanih pomislekov o varnosti pacientov in molčanja, nista pa bili povezani s pogostostjo spregovorjenja o škodljivih dogodkih. Stres se zmerno visoko pozitivno povezuje z zaznanimi pomisleki o varnosti pacientov, visoko pozitivno z molčanjem ter nizko pozitivno s spregovorjenjem. Zadovoljstvo se nizko negativno povezuje z zaznanimi pomisleki in molčanjem, ne povezuje pa se s spregovorjenjem. Razprava in zaključek: Na podlagi rezultatov lahko zaključimo, da je udeleženim zdravstvenim delavcem pomembna varnost pacientov in da tudi zdravstvene organizacije vzdržujejo razmeroma dobro kulturo varnosti. Hkrati smo ugotovili, da je med zaposlenimi še vedno razmeroma redko spregovorjenje o škodljivih dogodkih. Zaznana raven stresa med zaposlenimi je razmeroma nizka, zadovoljstvo med zaposlenimi pa razmeroma visoko. Splošna in s poročanjem škodljivih dogodkov povezana psihološka varnost se povezujeta s pogostostjo zaznanih pomislekov o varnosti pacientov in molčanjem, nista pa povezani s spregovorjenjem. Poročanje škodljivih dogodkov se pomembno povezuje s stresom in zadovoljstvom pri delu. Ugotovitve raziskave so pokazale pomembnost psihološke varnosti na delovnih mestih zdravstvenih delavcev. Potrebne so nadaljnje raziskave na področju poročanja škodljivih dogodkov in izboljšanja varnosti pacientov v zdravstvenih sistemih.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:magistrska dela, zdravstvena nega, varnost pacientov, spregovorjenje, molčanje, zdravstveni delavci
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[A. Babnik]
Year:2026
Number of pages:VIII, 36 str., [2] str. pril.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-182639 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-083
COBISS.SI-ID:278719491 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:20.05.2026
Views:301
Downloads:119
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Reporting of adverse events: association with psychological safety, stress and employee satisfaction : master thesis
Abstract:
Introduction: Ensuring patient safety is a global challenge that affects healthcare systems across different cultures and societies. For more effective prevention of adverse events, healthcare organizations must create an environment that encourages employees to speak openly about their errors, near misses, or non-compliance with established procedures. Purpose: The purpose of this master’s thesis is to determine the extent to which healthcare professionals have concerns about patient safety, remain silent in the event of an adverse event, and speak up about a potential adverse event. Furthermore, the study aims to examine the relationships between these behaviors, perceived psychological safety in the workplace, perceived stress, and healthcare workers’ job satisfaction. Methods: A non-experimental quantitative research method was used. The sample was recruited using the snowball sampling technique. A total of 165 physicians and nurses participated, completing standardized self-report questionnaires on reporting adverse events, psychological safety in the workplace, and perceived stress, as well as rating their job satisfaction. The analysis included descriptive statistical methods and calculation of correlation coefficients. Results: We found that the participating healthcare professionals experienced patient safety concerns with varying frequency, with some reporting them more than ten times in the past month. On average, they remained silent about these events relatively rarely, but they also spoke up relatively rarely. On average, healthcare professionals reported relatively low levels of stress and fairly high levels of job satisfaction. Both general psychological safety and psychological safety related to reporting adverse events were negatively associated with the frequency of perceived patient safety concerns and with silence but were not associated with the frequency of speaking up about adverse events. Stress showed a moderately strong positive association with perceived patient safety concerns, a strong positive association with silence, and a weak positive association with speaking up. Job satisfaction was weakly negatively associated with perceived concerns and silence, and was not associated with speaking up. Discussion and conclusion: Based on the results, we can conclude that patient safety is important to the participating healthcare workers and that healthcare organizations also maintain a relatively good safety culture. At the same time, we found that discussing adverse events is still relatively rare among employees. The perceived level of stress among employees is relatively low, and employee satisfaction is relatively high. General and reporting-related psychological safety are related to the frequency of perceived patient safety concerns and silence, but not to speaking up. Reporting adverse events is significantly associated with stress and job satisfaction. The research findings showed the importance of psychological safety in the workplaces of healthcare workers. Further research is needed around reporting adverse events and improving patient safety in healthcare systems.

Keywords:master theses, nursing care, patient safety, speaking up, silence, healthcare professionals

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back