Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
From turn to affect to return to Freud
ID
Šumah, Lidija
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(215,53 KB)
MD5: 3A04659D1E3E660BAA707444528095AD
Image galllery
Abstract
While philosophy is often depicted as a succession of conceptual turns, psychoanalysis resists such periodization. If psychoanalysis constitutes a turn at all, it is the radical decentering inaugurated by Freud’s discovery of the unconscious, famously condensed in the claim that the ego is not master in its own house. This article argues, following Lacan, that psychoanalysis advances not through new turns but through a return to Freud. Lacan’s return to Freud functions both as a methodological project and a polemical intervention against postwar ego psychology. Central to this project is the concept of extimacy (extimité), introduced by Lacan to name a structure of subjectivity in which the most intimate core of the subject is irreducibly external. Far from an idiosyncratic neologism, extimacy condenses Lacan’s rereading of Freud’s theory of the unconscious as neither inside nor outside the subject but lodged at its core as Other – hence Lacan’s claim that “the unconscious is the discourse of the Other.” The article proposes Lacan’s theory of the symbolic and the notion of extimacy as a conceptual response to the dilemmas of contemporary affect theory, preserving Freud’s decentering of the subject while translating it into a structural and linguistic framework. The analysis underscores that any engagement between affect and language must account for the non-representational, symbolic, or structural dimensions of the sign, rather than treating it as a transparent conduit for meaning and intention. As such, the analysis challenges contemporary dominant accounts of affect (Jameson, Lyotard, Deleuze, Guattari, Massumi) and unsettles the presumed divide between modernism and postmodernism.
Language:
English
Keywords:
psychoanalysis
,
affect theory
,
language
,
poststructuralism
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2025
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
Str. 103-123, 290
Numbering:
Letn. 63, št. 11/12
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-182182
UDC:
159.964.26:159.942.6
ISSN on article:
0555-2419
COBISS.SI-ID:
275561475
Publication date in RUL:
29.04.2026
Views:
238
Downloads:
59
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Problemi : revija za kulturo in družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:
Problemi
Publisher:
Društvo za teoretsko psihoanalizo
ISSN:
0555-2419
COBISS.SI-ID:
13608448
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
psihoanaliza
,
teorija afekta
,
jezik
,
poststrukturalizem
Projects
Funder:
ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:
J6-4625-2022
Name:
Imena na konici nosu: imenovanje, voh in resnica
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back