Glycemic control is the cornerstone of diabetes management and the associated reduction in the risk of chronic complications. One important indicator of glycemic status is HbA1c in the blood. Its value represents an assessment of glycemia over the past three months.
In the master's thesis, we focused on 102 patients of the Diabetes Outpatient Clinic of the Celje General Hospital. After venous blood was collected in a tube with the added anticoagulant K2EDTA, we measured HbA1c in the patients using two immunochemical methods, first on the biochemical analyzer Cobas c501 manufactured by Roche Diagnostics at the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the Celje General Hospital and then on the POC (Point of care; at the patient) DCA Vantage device manufactured by Siemens Healthineers in the Diagnostic Laboratory of the ZSZD Nazarje. We statistically evaluated the accuracy or repeatability of the method for HbA1c on the DCA Vantage device, which, according to the results of the control material manufacturer (Siemens Healthineers), provided a comparable calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). This shows that the POC device in the ZSZD Nazarje is appropriately accurate or that the results of the analyses are reproducible and is thus suitable for monitoring the glycemic status of diabetic patients in the Diabetes Outpatient Clinic.
We statistically evaluated the comparability of the methods using the linear regression Passing-Bablok and examined the deviations between the methods. We found that there is a very high correlation between HbA1c measurements at the Celje General Hospital and the ZSZD Nazarje.
We statistically evaluated the comparability of the methods using the Bland-Altman correlation diagram between the two methods. We found that the two methods are consistent enough to be used interchangeably.
In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), favorable glycemic status is defined as well-controlled diabetes with HbA1c ≤ 7.0% and fasting serum or plasma glucose of 4 to 7 mmol/L and < 10 mmol/L after a meal. The proportion of patients who achieved the glycemic goal was 30.4% (HbA1c ≤ 7.0% or 53 mmol/mol), while the proportion of patients who did not achieve it was 69.6% (HbA1c ≥ 7.1% or 54 mmol/mol).
At the same time, in addition to HbA1c determinations, we monitored additional serum tests in patients that are most often determined in diabetic patients: glucose, creatinine with oGF, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol. With additional tests, we tried to gain a broader insight into the incidence of complications according to the achieved glycemic status of the patients and risk factors. Using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney statistical test, we compared additional serum tests in the group of patients who achieve the glycemic goal and those who do not.
|