Details

Analiza protikonkurenčnih praks in regulatornih odzivov v EU in mednarodnih trgih na primeru podjetja Ticketmaster : (magistrsko diplomsko delo)
ID Gabrijelčič, Hana (Author), ID Grilc, Peter (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,11 MB)
MD5: C0BD3F3524B46B4584EE73DD12514455

Abstract
Od osemdesetih let 20. stoletja je Ticketmaster s tehnološkimi inovacijami in strateškimi partnerstvi neprestano širil svoj vpliv in se uveljavil kot prevladujoča sila na primarnem in sekundarnem trgu prodaje vstopnic. Združitev z Live Nation leta 2010 je utrdila to prevlado in omogočila podjetju, da nadzira ne le prodajo vstopnic, ampak tudi promocijo koncertov in upravljanje prizorišč, s čimer je ustvarilo vertikalno integrirano podjetje z izrazito tržno močjo, ki zajema več vidikov ekosistema zabavnih prireditev v živo. Učinki tega monopola so očitni na več ključnih področjih: prevladujoč tržni delež, ki omejuje konkurenco, izključevalne pogodbe s prizorišči, ki omejujejo vstop konkurentov na trg, in cenovne prakse, ki izkoriščajo potrošnike z višjimi cenami vstopnic. Ta naloga analizira položaj na trgu ter tržno ravnanje podjetja Ticketmaster, predvsem kako njegova ravnanja zmanjšujejo izbiro potrošnikov in poslabšujejo težave s cenovno dostopnostjo in kakovostjo storitev v sektorju zabavnih prireditev.Cilj magistrske naloge je skozi celovito analizo zakonodajnih okvirjev, sodne prakse in politike izvrševanja konkurenčnega prava izrisati jasno sliko trenutne regulacije trga prodaje vstopnic ter oceniti njeno dejansko učinkovitost. Na podlagi primerjave med pravnimi sistemi EU in ZDA bo naloga skušala ugotoviti, ali med njimi obstajajo bistvene razlike v pristopu in izvrševanju ter kateri model zagotavlja višjo stopnjo varstva potrošnikov. Postavlja se vprašanje, ali je strategija dinamičnega določanja cen legitimna tržna inovacija ali zgolj oblika prikritega izkoriščanja tržne moči.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:konkurenčno pravo, prevladujoč položaj, vertikalni sporazumi, dinamično določanje cen, varstvo potrošnikov, Ticketmaster, EU, ZDA
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:H. Gabrijelčič
Year:2026
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (69 str.))
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-181325 This link opens in a new window
UDC:346.545
COBISS.SI-ID:275585027 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:01.04.2026
Views:383
Downloads:152
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Analysis of anticompetitive practices and regulatory responses in the EU and international markets: the case of Ticketmaster
Abstract:
Since the 1980s, Ticketmaster has continuously expanded its influence through technological innovations and strategic partnerships, establishing itself as the dominant force in both the primary and secondary ticketing markets. The merger with Live Nation in 2010 reinforced this dominance, enabling the company to control not only ticket sales but also concert promotion and venue management, thereby creating a vertically integrated dominant position with high market power, encompassing multiple aspects of the live entertainment ecosystem. The effects of this monopoly are evident across several key areas: a dominant market share that limits competition, exclusive venue agreements that restrict competitor entry, and pricing practices that exploit consumers through higher ticket prices. The aim of this paper is to analyze Ticketmaster’s market position and commercial behavior, focusing particularly on how its actions reduce consumer choice and exacerbate issues of affordability and service quality in the live entertainment sector. Based on a comparison of the legal systems of the EU and the United States, the thesis will seek to determine whether there are substantial differences in their regulatory approaches and enforcement practices, and which model provides a higher level of consumer protection. It further raises the question of whether dynamic pricing constitutes a legitimate market innovation or merely a form of concealed exploitation of market power.

Keywords:competition law, dominant position, vertical agreements, dynamic pricing, consumer protection, Ticketmaster, EU, USA

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back