Details

Dynamic protective capacity of nature based solutions in alpine infrastructure protection strategies
ID Kuschel, Erik (Author), ID Obriejetan, Michael (Author), ID Kuzmanić, Tamara (Author), ID Mikoš, Matjaž (Author), ID Seifert, Lukas (Author), ID Conevski, Slaven (Author), ID Wirth, Maria (Author), ID Canga, Eriona (Author), ID Fernandes, Sérgio (Author), ID Hübl, Johannes (Author), ID Stangl, Rosemarie (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (277,56 KB)
MD5: DD7EDAC337AD797C9B6110B194985D4D
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU26/EGU26-12578.html This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The combined pressure of climate change and an increasing demand for settlement space poses an escalating threat to critical infrastructure, human lives, and livelihoods in alpine regions. While conventional grey engineering is commonly deployed to provide immediate safety, its static nature often fails to adapt to shifting environmental risks and requires cost-intensive maintenance. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) offer a sustainable alternative, yet their deployment is hindered by a lack of quantitative links between physical hazardous processes and the long-term performance of individual solutions. To bridge this gap, this study introduces a three-layered framework to assess the protective capacity throughout the service-life of a NbS on a functional, quantitative, and temporal level. The methodology categorizes 74 NbS types against 29 distinct natural hazards and identifies six functional clusters using Principal Component Analysis. These clusters reveal strategic trends ranging from localized bioengineering solutions (e.g., vegetated cribwalls, live fascines) to landscape-level watershed management approaches (e.g., afforestation, wetland restoration). A specialized Mitigation Score identified "hotspots," such as erosion control, where NbS are highly effective, while highlighting critical "gaps" in complex flood hazards where hybrid grey-green infrastructure may be necessary. The Mitigation Score varied significantly across hazard classes. Erosion processes (e.g., sheet, rill, and gully) achieved the highest scores (1.90), supported by a high density of effective NbS interventions (21–33 types). Conversely, fluvial and pluvial flooding yielded moderate scores (1.64–1.66), while coastal and impact floods showed the lowest mitigation potential (1.00–1.42) due to a more limited range of viable NbS options. The framework’s core innovation is the use of temporal hazard profiles to track intervention utility across four phases: reduced predisposition, trigger prevention, ongoing process mitigation, and post-event resilience. These profiles reveal distinct patterns and visualises the temporally variable effectiveness for each individual natural hazard. Unlike grey infrastructures, which reach their maximum protection capacity immediately after construction, the effectiveness of NbS is not linear and is intrinsically linked to biological maturation, which may take decades. This framework provides practitioners and policymakers with a robust, evidence-based guide for the strategic and lifecycle-aware deployment of NbS, bridging the gap between theory and engineering practice to ensure the long-term resilience of alpine infrastructures and livelihoods.

Language:English
Work type:Abstract or summary
Typology:1.12 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution Abstract
Organization:FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:2 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-181069 This link opens in a new window
UDC:556
DOI:10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12578 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:272687619 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.03.2026
Views:411
Downloads:105
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:EGU General Assembly 2026 : Vienna, Austria & Online, 3–8 May 2026
Place of publishing:[Munich]
Publisher:EGU - European Geosciences Union
Year:2026
COBISS.SI-ID:272591107 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:mednarodno sodelovanje, znanost in družba, vodna agenda, Mednarodno združenje za hidrološke znanosti

Projects

Funder:EC - European Commission
Project number:101157448
Name:Nature-Based Solutions for Demonstrating Climate-Resilient Critical Infrastructure
Acronym:NATURE-DEMO

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back