Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plans : smokescreens or instruments for evidence-based policymaking?
ID
Erjavec, Emil
(
Author
),
ID
Rac, Ilona
(
Author
),
ID
Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(624,46 KB)
MD5: 6C7A2F26328D39824CDFB666DF4895AD
Image galllery
Abstract
Alongside the devolution of decision-making powers to Member States, the latest reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) introduced CAP Strategic Plans to enhance the design and implementation of increasingly complex policy objec-tives and to reinforce the use of evidence-based policymaking (EBPM). This paper is based on desk research, combining a comparative review of European Union (EU) regulations and programming documents, and insights from the Tools4CAP project, which conducted interviews, surveys, and focus groups across Member States. The gaps in strategic planning are evident in the weak logical connection between individ-ual phases of CSP preparation and the weak evidence-based justification of decisions regarding the selection and design of interventions. Quantitative tools and scientific evidence were underutilised, while political-economy constraints and path depend-ency dominated decision-making. As a result, CAP Strategic Plans were often devel-oped through a series of disconnected tasks, producing documents with loosely linked sections lacking overall coherence. The upcoming integration of CAP planning into broader National and Regional Partnership Plans may simplify procedures but risks weakening EBPM principles. Systematic integration of science into planning, method-ology development, interdisciplinarity, and better communication between research-ers and decision-makers are needed to realise the ideal concept of EBPM. Institutional capacities for the use of evidence need to be strengthened, mandatory impact assess-ments and open data platforms introduced, and dialogue between science and policy enhanced. The limitations include reliance on secondary data and qualitative insights rather than detailed empirical evaluation across all Member States.
Language:
English
Keywords:
common agricultural policy
,
strategic planning
,
policy cycle
,
science-policy dialogue
,
Multiannual Financial Framework
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
19.12.2025
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
Str. 7-21
Numbering:
Vol. 80, no. 3
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-179693
UDC:
631
ISSN on article:
2281-1559
DOI:
10.36253/rea-16856
COBISS.SI-ID:
269147651
Publication date in RUL:
20.02.2026
Views:
301
Downloads:
94
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Rivista di economia agraria
Shortened title:
Riv. econ. agrar.
Publisher:
Franco Angeli, Firenze university press
ISSN:
2281-1559
COBISS.SI-ID:
175746819
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
kmatijstvo
,
agrarna ekonomija
,
skupna kmetijska politika
,
strateško načrtovanje
Projects
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Project number:
101086311
Name:
Innovative Toolbox empowering effective CAP governance towards EU ambitions
Acronym:
Tools4CAP
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back