Details

The (im)possibility of primary arts teacher education
ID Meiners, Jeff (Author), ID Rowlands, Kerrin (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (221,24 KB)
MD5: 55FBE1423BC32AEF33FF257A53C489C8
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/2000 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
UNESCO strategies, including the 2006 Road Map for Arts Education, the 2010 Seoul Agenda for Arts Education and the 2024 Framework for Culture and Arts Education, highlight a persistent concern regarding the insufficient emphasis on arts education competencies among pre-service teachers and the challenge of allocating adequate curriculum time in education programmes. In Australia, recent government policies have included the arts as a school curriculum learning area with five subjects: Dance, Drama, Media Arts, Music and Visual Arts. This curriculum aims to ensure that all young Australians experience a com-prehensive arts education by providing a framework for teachers to implement sequential learning across the primary school years. Despite these efforts, Australian research tracking the implementation of the arts curriculum within schools and teacher education programmes remains limited, revealing a problematic gap. The present paper examines how an Australian university has attempted to address this gap by providing pre-service teachers with an “Arts Specialism” within a teacher education programme. Using education policy sociology theory, the study explores the contexts of influence, curriculum text production and policy implementation. Critical discourse analysis is used to identify negotiations between influential Australian stakeholders, including university programme leaders who have supported the concept of an arts curriculum specialism. The study addresses themes of arts education content and pedagogy, revealing challenges and opportunities in implementing this specialism and concluding with recommendations for future developments.

Language:English
Keywords:arts education, arts specialism, curriculum, policy, primary generalist teacher
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 51–72
Numbering:Vol. 15, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-179294 This link opens in a new window
UDC:37.091.3:7.01
ISSN on article:2232-2647
DOI:10.26529/cepsj.2000 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:243474435 This link opens in a new window
Copyright:
Podatek o licenci CC-BY 4.0 je naveden na spletni strani revije (https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/about). (Datum opombe 10. 2. 2026)
Publication date in RUL:10.02.2026
Views:216
Downloads:74
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal = revija Centra za študij edukacijskih strategij
Publisher:Pedagoška fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani
ISSN:2232-2647
COBISS.SI-ID:254029824 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:(Ne)možnost izobraževanja učiteljev umetnostne vzgoje na razredni stopnji
Abstract:
Unescove strategije, vključno z Načrtom za umetnostno vzgojo iz leta 2006, s Seulsko agendo – Cilji za razvoj umetnostne vzgoje iz leta 2010 ter z Okvirom za kulturno-umetnostno vzgojo iz leta 2024, poudarjajo trajno zaskrbljenost glede nezadostnega poudarka na kompetencah s področja umetnostne vzgoje pri bodočih učiteljih in izziv zagotavljanja ustreznega obsega umetnostne vzgoje v učnih načrtih izobraževalnih programov. V Avstraliji so nedavne vladne politike vključile umetnost kot samostojno področje v šolskem učnem načrtu, ki obsega pet pred-metov: ples, gledališče, medijske umetnosti, glasbo in likovno umetnost. Cilj tega kurikuluma je zagotoviti, da bodo vsi mladi Avstralci deležni celostne umetnostne vzgoje, in sicer prek ogrodja, ki učiteljem omogoča postopno in povezano učenje umetnosti skozi celotno obdobje osnovne šole. Kljub tem prizadevanjem je na voljo malo raziskav, ki bi spremljale uresničevanje umetnostnega kurikuluma v šolah in programih izobraževanja učiteljev, kar razkriva problematično vrzel. Prispevek obravnava, kako je ena izmed avstralskih univerz skušala to vrzel nasloviti z uvedbo t. i. »specializacije za umetnosti« (Arts Specialism) v okviru programa izobraževanja učiteljev. Z uporabo sociološke teorije edukacijskih politik raziskava preučuje vplivne kontekste, oblikovanje učnih načrtov in uresničevanje politik. Kritična diskurzivna analiza se uporablja za prepoznavanje pogajanj med ključnimi deležniki v Avstraliji, vključno z vodji univerzitetnih programov, ki podpirajo koncept specializacije za umetnostni kurikulum. Študija obravnava teme, povezane z vsebino in didaktiko umetnostne vzgoje, razkriva izzive in priložnosti pri uvajanju te specializacije ter zaključuje s priporočili za nadaljnji razvoj.

Keywords:umetnostna vzgoja, specializacija za umetnost, učni načrt, politika, razredni učitelj splošnega profila, umetnost, vzgoja in izobraževanje

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. CEPS journal

Back