Details

Simulated role plays or field observation? : usability testing of a healthcare phrasebook
ID Kocijančič-Pokorn, Nike (Author), ID Esih, Martin (Author), ID Zelko, Erika (Author), ID Hirci, Nataša (Author), ID Milavec Kapun, Marija (Author), ID Mikolič Južnič, Tamara (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (520,98 KB)
MD5: CD65CB2A23B95E631FE2F0620371703C
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0907676X.2024.2326965 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
The aim of this article is (1) to report on a usability study on the acceptability of a multilingual phrasebook for healthcare providers and (2) to compare the effectiveness and the efficiency of two key usability research methods: simulated role play and field observation. The usability study focused on the phrasebook’s acceptability (i.e., the extent to which the users consider it to be appropriate and serve its purpose), and consisted of two steps: first the acceptability was checked through simulated role play, involving 450 healthcare professionals, and second through field observation of five healthcare providers and 18 patients using the phrasebook in clinical settings. The results showed that the users are quite satisfied with the multilingual phrasebook; however, they also indicated that it hinders eye contact and does not offer sufficient support in more complex healthcare situations. The simulated roleplay and observation study both yielded comparable results. While the observation study was slightly more effective, if less efficient, the simulation study was very efficient and also highly effective, providing we focus only on the participants assuming the professional identity they have in real life, and thus proved to be a reliable alternative to observation methods in usability research.

Language:English
Keywords:method comparison, usability research methods, simulated role play, field observation, healthcare phrasebook, multilingual aids in healthcare
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2026
Number of pages:Str. 53–71
Numbering:Vol. 34, no. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-178400 This link opens in a new window
UDC:81'243-056.24(497.4)
ISSN on article:0907-676X
DOI:10.1080/0907676X.2024.2326965 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:189744899 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.01.2026
Views:358
Downloads:165
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Perspectives : studies in translation theory and practice
Shortened title:Perspect. stud. transl.
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0907-676X
COBISS.SI-ID:1680226 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Projects

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0446
Name:Teoretično, opisno in uporabno prevodoslovje

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back