Details

Nothingness at the Crossroads of Minor Canons : A Dialogue between Wang Fuzhi and Charles de Bovelles
ID Ambrogio, Selusi (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (782,46 KB)
MD5: 512EFB0EC4476AF67138D558C21AD2A5
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://journals.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/20628 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
It is a mainstream assumption that Asian thinkers, and Chinese in particular, have devoted much of their speculative energies to investigating emptiness and nothingness, whereas these philosophical concepts would have been neglected (if not abhorred) in Western thought. As Sorensen (2022, 77) says: “Having climbed to the precipice of being, the Chinese and Indians pan across the vista of nothingness. They see an open horizon of opportunity. The Greeks look down the cliff. They suffer vertigo”. In this article, we set ourselves the task of questioning this assumption by presenting two authors who represent opposing tendencies within their respective traditions. On the one hand, Wang Fuzhi 王夫之 (1619–1692), normally described as a “materialist” and a bitter opponent of the “emptiness” and “nothingness” of Buddhists and Daoists. On the other, Charles de Bovelles (1479–1566), author of the short treatise Liber de Nihilo, in which nothingness is posited as necessary to God for his existence and the unfolding of his power. Despite being in different traditions and with different visions of nothingness, we will see how their respective thoughts can meet and engage in dialogue in a productive manner.

Language:English
Keywords:nothingness, minor canons, Wang Fuzhi, Charles de Bovelles, negative theology, Neo-Confucianism
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:09.05.2025
Number of pages:Str. 153-175
Numbering:Vol. 13, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-178269 This link opens in a new window
ISSN:2232-5131
eISSN:2350-4226
DOI:https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2025.13.2.153-175 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:22.01.2026
Views:266
Downloads:189
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Asian studies
Publisher:Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Založba Univerze v Ljubljani
ISSN:2232-5131
COBISS.SI-ID:265206272 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Nič na stičišču drugotnih kanonov : dialog med Wang Fuzhijem in Charlesom de Bovellesom
Abstract:
Prevladujoče prepričanje je, da so azijske mislice in misleci, med njimi še posebej kita-jski, veliko svojih spekulativnih prizadevanj namenjali raziskovanju praznine in niča, medtem ko naj bi bili v zahodni misli ti koncepti zapostavljeni (če ne kar z gnusom zavrn-jeni). Kakor pravi Sorensen (2022, 77): »Ko priplezajo do previsa biti, se pred Kitajci in Indijci razprostre razgled niča. Vidijo odprto obzorje priložnosti. Grki zrejo dol s pečine. Muči jih vrtoglavica.« V tem članku prevprašujemo to predpostavko s predstavitvijo dveh avtorjev, ki zastopata nasprotne težnje znotraj svojih tradicij. Na eni strani je Wang Fuzhi 王夫之 (1619–1692), ki ga po navadi opisujejo kot »materialista« ter zagrizenega nasprotnika »praznine« in »niča« budistov in daoistov. Na drugi je Charles de Bovelles (1479–1566), avtor kratke razprave Liber de nihilo, v kateri je nič postavljen kot nujnost za obstoj Boga in za razodevanje njegove moči. Kljub pripadnosti različnim tradicijam in različnim pogledom na nič bomo videli, kako se lahko njuna razmišljanja srečajo in stopijo v produktiven dialog.

Keywords:nič, drugotni kanoni, Wang Fuzhi, Charles de Bovelles, negativna te-ologija, neokonfucianizem

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back