Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
GIBSU-DEMATEL : enhancing group decision-making by integrating expert satisfaction and uncertainty in interval judgments
ID
Dolinar, Gregor
(
Author
),
ID
Grošelj, Petra
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(2,69 MB)
MD5: F91422AEA2D05A97386BD1DB758B88D2
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417426000552
Image galllery
Abstract
In complex decision-making environments, expert judgments are often uncertain and divergent, making aggregation into a single numerical value problematic. The classical Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) addresses interdependencies among criteria but aggregates expert inputs using simple averaging, which neglects opinion diversity and creates an artificial sense of certainty. To address these limitations, we propose Group Interval-Based DEMATEL method Balancing Satisfaction and Uncertainty (GIBSU-DEMATEL), a novel framework that represents group judgments as intervals and optimizes their construction to simultaneously maximize expert satisfaction and minimize judgmental uncertainty. This dual-objective approach ensures that aggregated results better reflect the diversity of expert perspectives while maintaining analytical rigor. Unlike existing interval or fuzzy DEMATEL variants, which focus primarily on uncertainty, GIBSU-DEMATEL formalizes the trade-off between expert satisfaction and uncertainty through an optimization function, producing causal maps that are both interpretable and socially acceptable. The framework is validated through a case study on learning management system selection in higher education, demonstrating improved robustness, higher satisfaction, and transparent representation of divergent opinions compared with classical, interval and fuzzy DEMATEL. Sensitivity analysis further confirms the adaptability and reliability of the method across decision scenarios.
Language:
English
Keywords:
DEMATEL
,
group decision making
,
interval judgments
,
expert satisfaction
,
uncertainty
,
learning management system
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.05.2026
Year:
2026
Number of pages:
17 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 308, [article no.] ǂ131141
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-178152
UDC:
519.8:005.53
ISSN on article:
1873-6793
DOI:
10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131141
COBISS.SI-ID:
265330691
Publication date in RUL:
20.01.2026
Views:
472
Downloads:
324
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Expert systems with applications
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
1873-6793
COBISS.SI-ID:
23001861
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
DEMATEL
,
skupinsko odločanje
,
intervalne ocene
,
zadovoljstvo strokovnjakov
,
negotovost
,
e-izobraževalni sistem
Projects
Funder:
ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:
P4-0059-2020
Name:
Gozd, gozdarstvo in obnovljivi gozdni viri
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back