Details

Introducing qualified majority voting in the common foreign and security policy : perspectives from Slovenia and Slovakia
ID Udovič, Boštjan (Author), ID Žipaj, Tomáš (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1008,65 KB)
MD5: C4C608DDDE663BAE65565C2389F0C2A5

Abstract
The article examines the positions of Slovenia and Slovakia on introducing qualified majority voting in the area of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (QMV CFSP). This topic has gained significance in recent years due to various attempts to obstruct decision-making within the European Union. The analysis is conducted on two levels: Official government statements from both countries and the perceptions of students on the issue. The findings reveal a stark contrast between the two levels. While Slovenia and Slovakia hold opposing official positions on QMV CFSP, students from both countries largely support its introduction. However, there is a notable difference regarding QMV CFSP as a preliminary step towards deeper integration: Slovak students are somewhat more reserved than their Slovenian counterparts. This suggests that the political discourse in Central and Eastern Europe, particularly concerns over the ‘dangers of EU deepening’, is influencing younger generations and the student population.

Language:English
Keywords:qualified majority, voting system
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Geographic coverage:Slovenija; Slovaška;
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 90-106
Numbering:Vol. 18, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-178029 This link opens in a new window
UDC:061.1EU
ISSN on article:1338-1385
COBISS.SI-ID:241479939 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:16.01.2026
Views:301
Downloads:80
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Journal of comparative politics
Publisher:Department of Political Science, Center for Analysis of Administrative-Political Processes and Institutions, Alma Mater Europea-European Centre Maribor (AMEU-ECM)
ISSN:1338-1385
COBISS.SI-ID:29224285 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Uvedba glasovanja s kvalificirano večino v skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki: pogledi iz Slovenije in Slovaške
Abstract:
Članek se osredotoča na stališča Slovenije in Slovaške glede uvedbe glasovanja s kvalificirano večino na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) – vprašanja, ki je postalo posebej aktualno v zadnjih letih, ko so se v okviru Evropske unije začeli pojavljati različni poskusi blokiranja odločanja. Analiza je izvedena na dveh ravneh: na ravni uradnih stališč političnih elit oziroma političnih odločevalcev v Sloveniji in na Slovaškem ter na ravni študentske populacije obeh držav. Glavne ugotovitve je mogoče razvrstiti v dve skupini. Prvič, Slovenija in Slovaška imata na ravni političnih odločevalcev nasprotna stališča do uvedbe glasovanja s kvalificirano večino v okviru SZVP. Drugič, stališča študentov obeh držav so si medsebojno bistveno bolj podobna kot stališča političnih elit.

Keywords:kvalificirana večina, glasovalni sistem

Projects

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P5-0177
Name:Slovenija in njeni akterji v mednarodnih odnosih in evropskih integracijah

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J5-50173
Name:Rastoča kulturna razdalja in stereotipizacija v malih tranzicijskih državah: primer držav nekdanje Jugoslavije

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Collection

This document is a part of these collections:
  1. Journal of comparative politics

Back