Prenehanje gradbene pogodbe : restitucijski zahtevki in pravila vračanja

Muzaferović, Ines (author), Lutman, Karmen (mentor)

Magistrsko delo obravnava restitucijske zahtevke in pravila vračanja v primeru prenehanja gradbene pogodbe. Ker se predmet izpolnitve praviloma neločljivo poveže z naročnikovo nepremičnino, vrnitev v naravi ni mogoča. Magistrsko delo se zato osredotoča na vprašanje vrednotenja koristi, ki je predmet restitucijskega zahtevka, pri čemer ne obravnava posledic prenehanja gradbene pogodbe zaradi neveljavnosti (ničnosti ali izpodbojnosti) in odškodninskih zahtevkov. Magistrsko delo najprej obravnava pravno podlago prenehanja pogodbe v splošnem in posebnem delu Obligacijskega zakonika skupaj s sodno prakso ter pravne učinke prenehanja pogodbe. Nato predstavi pravila vračanja pri prenehanju dvostranskih pogodb po 111. členu Obligacijskega zakonika in pravu neupravičene obogatitve po 190. do 198. členu Obligacijskega zakonika. Posebna pozornost je namenjena vprašanju, kako se vrednoti korist pri prenehanju gradbene pogodbe, bodisi v višini vrednosti vlaganj bodisi v višini povečanja vrednosti nepremičnine ter merilu za določanje denarne vrednosti koristi in časovnemu trenutku, ki je pri tem odločilen. V nadaljevanju magistrsko delo primerjalno predstavi ureditev v hrvaškem pravu, iz katere izhaja, da so pravila vračanja enaka kot v slovenskem pravu. Nazadnje magistrsko delo primerja vrednotenje koristi pri kondikcijskih zahtevkih z vrednotenjem koristi pri verzijskih zahtevkih, ki se nanašajo na vlaganja v tujo nepremičnino in ugotavlja, da pravila o povračilu izdatkov, ki so bili opravljeni v tujo korist, niso enotna. Ker je bistvena razlika med njima zgolj v tem, da so vlaganja v tujo nepremičnino v okviru gradbene pogodbe predmet pogodbene obveznosti, magistrsko delo zagovarja stališče, da za razlikovanje v vrednotenju koristi ni utemeljenega razloga ter zagovarja enoten pristop vrednotenja koristi glede na vrednost opravljenih vlaganj.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: prenehanje pogodbe, pravila vračanja, pravo neupravičene obogatitve, vrednotenje koristi, vrednost opravljenih vlaganj, povečanje vrednosti nepremičnine, primerjalna analiza, kondikcijski zahtevek, verzijski zahtevek
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Publication status: Published
• Publication version: Version of Record
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: I. Muzaferović
• Year: 2025
• Number of pages: 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (33 str.))
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-177564
• UDC: 347(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 268423427
• Publication date in RUL: 24.12.2025

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Termination of a construction contract : restitution claims and rules of return

Abstract

The master's thesis deals with restitution claims and the rules of return in the event of the termination of a construction contract. Since the subject of performance is, as a rule, inseparably connected to the client’s real estate, return in nature is not possible. The master’s thesis therefore focuses on the issue of evaluating the benefit that is the subject of the restitution claim, without addressing the consequences of the termination of the construction contract due to invalidity (nullity or voidability) and claims for damages. The master’s thesis first deals with the legal basis for contract termination in general and specific part of the Obligations Code, together with case law and the legal effects of contract termination. It then presents the rules on restitution upon termination of bilateral contracts under Article 111 of the Obligations Code and the law of unjust enrichment under Articles 190 to 198 of the Obligations Code. Special attention is paid to the question of how to evaluate the benefit upon termination of a construction contract, either in terms of the value of the investment or in terms of the increase in the value of the property, and the criteria for determining the monetary value of the benefit and the decisive moment in time. The master's thesis then presents a comparative overview of the regulations in Croatian law, which show that the rules for restitution are the same as in Slovenian law. Finally, the master's thesis compares the valuation of benefit in condiction claims with the valuation of benefit in versio claims relating to investments in foreign real estate and concludes that the rules on the reimbursement of expenses incurred for the benefit of a foreign party are not uniform. Since the only significant difference between the two is that investments in foreign real estate under a construction contract are subject to contractual obligations, the master's thesis argues that there is no justified reason for the difference in the valuation of benefit and advocates a uniform approach to the valuation of benefit based on the value of the investments made.

• Keywords: termination of a contract, rules of return, law of unjust enrichment, valuation of benefit, value of performed investments, increase in property value, comparative analysis, condictio claim, versio claim