Primerjava učinkovitosti čiščenja podrasti z motorno žago in motorno koso : diplomsko delo - visokošolski strokovni študij

Gorenc, Rok (author), Krč, Janez (mentor)

Meritve za diplomsko nalogo so potekale v letu 2009 pod trasami daljnovodov na območju Novega mesta, Mirne peči ter Krskega. Namen naloge je bila predstavitev ter primerjava učinkovitosti dveh načinov dela pri čiščenju podrasti. Študijo smo izvedli na stirih objektih, ki so predstavljali različne pogoje za delo. Na vsakem objektu je bila popisana drevesna vrsta, debelina in gostota podrasti, delez ostankov drevja na tleh, skalovitost ter naklon terena. Znotraj objektov smo snemali način dela z motorno žago in motorno koso ter ju primerjali med sabo. Ugotovili smo da je način dela z motorno koso učinkovitejši in cenejši. Povprečni učinek pri motorni žagi je znašal 357 m2/ou, pri motorni kosi pa 488 m2/ou. Povprečni stroški za očiščenje m2 površine so pri motorni zagi znasali 0,071 EUR, pri motorni kosi pa0,041 EUR.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: motorna kosa, motorna žaga, podrast, sečnja, primerjava, učinki, stroški
• Work type: Undergraduate thesis
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: BF - Biotechnical Faculty
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: [R. Gorenc]
• Year: 2010
• Number of pages: VII, 42 f.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-17752
• UDC: 630*32(043.2)=163.6
• COBISS.SI-ID: 3055526
• Publication date in RUL: 11.07.2014

GORENC, Rok, 2010, Primerjava učinkovitosti čiščenja podrasti z motorno žago in motorno koso : diplomsko delo - visokošolski strokovni študij [online]. Bachelor’s thesis. Ljubljana : R. Gorenc. [Accessed 25 April 2025]. Retrieved from: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=eng&id=17752

Secondary language

• Language: Unknown

Abstract

Measurements for my thesis took place under electricity transmission lines in the areas of Novo mesto, Mirna Peč and Krsko and were done in year 2009. Main purposes of the thesis were to present and compare the effectiveness of two different methods of working in cleaning of undergrowth. This research was carried out at four facilities representing various working conditions. At each facility, we marked tree species, thickness and density of undergrowth, portion of residues of trees in the ground, portion of rocks and a slope of the terrain. We recorded and compared both methods of working within the facilities, one method with a chainsaw and the other with a brush saw. We havefound that working with the motor scythe is more efficient and less expensive. The average effect of chainsaw was 357 m2/machine hour and the average effect of brush saw was 488 m2/machine hour. The average costs for cleaning of one square meter with chainsaw were 0,071 eur, whereas the average costs with brush saw were 0,041 eur.