Details

Fragmented governance in the Belt and Road Initiative : aligning policy with SDGs 8 and 9
ID Hu, Haisheng (Author), ID Pikalo, Jernej (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,31 MB)
MD5: D9AA4753C56533309A5EF563B72D868F
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70087 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
This study investigates how fragmented governance shapes the Belt and Road Initiative's (BRI) contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 and 9. Although the BRI's stated objectives align with the SDG agenda, empirical evidence from EU countries reveals that institutional fragmentation and policy misalignment can significantly hinder sustainable development outcomes. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study applies Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to a corpus of 321 BRI-related policy documents to extract thematic patterns and assess their semantic alignment with SDG 8 and 9 keyword frameworks. It then analyzes governance fragmentation at the domestic level, EU-member states level, and China-EU level, complemented by case studies of Italy, Poland, Croatia, and Slovenia to explore how different levels of fragmentation impede BRI project implementation and weaken SDG progress. The findings reveal three key insights: (1) BRI-related discourse demonstrates moderate alignment with SDGs 8 and 9 in terms of policy narratives; (2) governance fragmentation in EU countries is multi-dimensional and structurally embedded; and (3) fragmentation undermines BRI project continuity and its developmental impact. This research proposes a three-pronged policy framework comprising politically neutral commitment mechanisms, EU-compatible regulatory alignment guidelines, and adaptive pathways for SDG compliance—designed to strengthen institutional coherence and enhance the sustainability of cross-border BRI cooperation.

Language:English
Keywords:Belt and Road Initiative, fragmented governance, Sustainable Development Goals, policy misalignment, infrastructure development, thematic analysis
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 1004-1020
Numbering:Vol. 16, iss. 5
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-176731 This link opens in a new window
UDC:32:502.131.1
ISSN on article:1758-5880
DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.70087 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:251571203 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:10.12.2025
Views:67
Downloads:26
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Global policy
Publisher:Wiley, Durham University
ISSN:1758-5880
COBISS.SI-ID:21848806 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back